Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
    643·
    9 months ago

    It all reads hollow because there is no “I”. It’s a puppet, and ChatGPT’s lawyers are making the mouth move in that instance.

    • DrQuint@lemm.eeEnglish
      26·
      9 months ago

      This is actually very accurate. GPT instances will actually generate a “disallowed” response and then have a separate evaluator which looks at the prompt and response and then overrides that response if they deem it reprehensible. (There’s also a bunch of pre-prompts as well)

      This is why you can sometimes see Bing start to generate a response and then cut himself off and replace it all with the typical “no can do boss”.

      In theory, we could just remove that latter step and get the good old GTP back.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.worldEnglish
      59·
      9 months ago

      It all reads hollow because there is no “I”.

      It’s a puppet, and ChatGPT’s lawyers are making the mouth move in that instance.

      • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
        English
        144·
        9 months ago

        It all reads hollow

        because there is no “I”.

        It’s a puppet,

        and ChatGPT’s lawyers are making the mouth move

        in that instance.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldEnglish
          102·
          9 months ago

          It all

          reads hollow

          because

          there is no “I”.

          It’s a

          puppet,

          and ChatGPT’s lawyers are

          making the mouth move

          in that instance.