Questioning witnesses in the first impeachment hearing staged by House Republicans, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez prompted each to say they were not presenting “firsthand witness accounts” of crimes committed by Joe Biden.

The New York Democrat also accused Republicans of fabricating supposed evidence of corruption involving the president and his surviving son, Hunter Biden.

Republicans on the House oversight committee called three witnesses, Democrats one.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that … appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation… That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

    She caught them fabricating evidence in the hearing. They shopped a bubble around a section of a larger text to take it out of context and make it look like a standalone statement. She (read: her staff) went through the exhibits and found the actual quote with context that entirely changed the meaning of the statement.

    • HiddenLychee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this is allowed because the congressmen who presented the “evidence” were not under oath, so they’re allowed to completely doctor fake evidence?

      • Nobody@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the days of yore, public figures cared about at least pretending to have integrity in the public eye. The system wasn’t built with many safeguards against bad actors who do so publicly with zero sense of shame.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a contentious opinion. The system *was" built with safeguards against bad actors without shame. I think the founders assumed that dueling would serve that purpose. Anyone who was routinely obnoxious would end up getting killed eventually.

    • t3h_fool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is terrible reporting. Could the Guardian have shown the screenshot? Could they have asked what the context was? I don’t understand why this all is behind a mostly opaque screen. Why we are being told something that obfuscates what was said rather than giving us the chance to judge for ourselves.

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The entire impeachment theater is directed at low-information voters. People who will find out about the hearing and not bother to read or watch to find out it’s a nothingburger, who won’t read the accusations but just take it that there’s a scandal, and who will throw their hands up and say “both sides are the same” because they’re impeaching one another’s presidents.

    • Goo_bubbs@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s okay to just say Republicans instead of low-information voters, since the Venn diagram for them is a circle.

  • June@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s calling them out on it, not accusing them of it.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, accusing makes it sound uncertain. When they want to seem balanced but there’s a hippo on one side of the balance it’s not balancing it’s helping legitimize the false side.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      She is a bit of a unicorn there. Even among what they were calling her posse of new politicos, she’s a stand-out brand-focused mouthpiece for her own agenda.

      I’m ever so glad her agenda happens to align with helping people, as she’s a force of nature.

      • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yet the centrist Democrats hate her, even though she’s energized her voting base, pushed for legislation, made more interested in running for office, and doesn’t bow down to Republicans because they were nice to her one time.

  • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    She went on to accuse cheetahs of running fast, mountans of being tall and fire of being hot. Fox news denied all of her claims as hearsay and deep state propaganda.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dear The guardian. The word you are looking for is “Fabricating”. One would think that journalists would be proficient in the language they report in. But maybe that’s just me expecting unrealistic standards.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Journalist often target their content to people with a low reading age. Some tabloids in the UK target their content for someone of a reading age of 7. Even the financial times a high brow economic paper targets a reading age of 12.

      It’s likely the journalist made a conscious decision to not say fabricate, as that would restrict the amount of people that could comprehend the headline.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll take your word for it. So, in short, I am in fact expecting an unrealistic standard. Complaining about shit like this makes me feel like an old grumpy man, and I’m not even 30 yet

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The New York Democrat also accused Republicans of fabricating supposed evidence of corruption involving the president and his surviving son, Hunter Biden.

    Turning to Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University and well-known conservative commentator, she said: “In your testimony today, are you presenting any firsthand witness account of crimes committed by the president of the United States?”

    Ocasio-Cortez asked the same question of Eileen O’Connor, a former assistant attorney general in the justice department tax division who worked for Donald Trump’s transition team and is a member of the rightwing Federalist Society.

    Ocasio-Cortez said she would “assume the same” of the sole witness called by Democrats, Michael J Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor.

    Referring to Byron Donalds, she said: “Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that … appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation.

    Donalds showed text messages he claimed indicated that Hunter Biden engaged in fraud and money laundering, to the benefit of his father.


    The original article contains 509 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 65%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!