The YouTube channel “Maximum Fury” conducted a technical test of the new Cyberpunk add-on called “Phantom Liberty” on an older AMD hardware system, testing it separately on Linux and Windows 11. The Linux system, specifically the Fedora distribution called Nobara, performed significantly better, delivering 31% more frames compared to Windows 11.

The hardware used for testing included an Asrock B550 motherboard with an AMD Ryzen 5 5600 CPU and an AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT GPU from the first RDNA generation, along with 16 GB of DDR4 RAM. The CPU, RAM, and GPU were overclocked, and the system utilized undervolting to save energy costs.

When testing the game at 1080p resolution with high textures, the Linux system achieved an average of 63.72 frames per second (fps), while Windows 11 managed only 48.55 fps. This suggests that the game should run noticeably smoother on the Linux system.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    A 30% increase in performance just might get gamers to switch over to the new operating system.

    Hell that is the difference between a better graphics card for some people. It’s like getting a free overclock, just for going outside your comfort zone.

    • Yote.zip@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a rare and extreme case, which is probably caused by some sort of fluke in the testing method or due to a bug in the game that Linux is handling better. Usually gaming on Linux is like ~5-10% slower for GPU-bound games.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      linux users still coping

      nobody likes linux yall are chatting in an echo chamber. lemmy feels like a comp sci major college party lol

  • Mindlight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a well known fact that every second major release of Windows is crap.

    • Windows 95 was not the best.
    • Windows 95OSR2 was the one you wanted.
    • Windows 98 sucked.
    • Windows 98 2nd ed. worked as the former should have.
    • Windows 2000 was great but had no support for running games.
    • XP solved that and made people leave Windows 98 (I deliberately left out the clusterf… Windows ME.).
    • Windows Vista sucked balls.
    • Windows 7 was what Vista should have been.
    • Windows 8? Metro on phones, yes! On desktop? No no no.
    • Windows 10 got Microsoft back on track again.

    I thought the new upgrade scheme (2 editions per year) Microsoft introduced with Windows 10 would be like “every second release will suck” but it started to look like Microsoft were able to break the curse…

    …and then Windows 11 happened.

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ran 2000 back in the day and didn’t really have any problems with it. IMO it breaks the pattern somewhat. XP was better, of course, but 2000 was a good OS.

  • NBJack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows 11 is trash. Microsoft kept boasting it was “faster” than 10, but it is (unsurprisingly?) heavy in some weird areas, including a less snappy start menu, more telemetry, invasive integration with their software, you name it. Tried one machine in my collection to try it via an upgrade (a Microsoft Surface Pro 6), and the performance was so bad I ended up going back to Windows 10. Multi-second lag just to get to the program shortcuts is a really bad sign.

  • Swiggles@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is just unfortunate that it does not run on Nvidia hardware. The benchmark runs if you disable all RTX features, but it crashes on a new game before you even have full control of the character.

    Looking at protondb it looks like all people with Nvidia have issues since the 2.0 update. I hope there will be some fix soon. I don’t want to replace the GPU yet it would be a waste (2080 Super).

    For now I am playing it on my Steam Deck instead.

    • visnudeva@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know what you’re talking about, It run very well on my Nvidia GPU on Linux before and after the patch and DLC.

    • potajito@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No issues here, more than 20 hours on Linux on a 3080 latest drivers, wayland, , dlss, ray tracing or not, works great.

      • heyoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you do ray tracing on Linux? I played today a bit and the option was grayed out. I’m on X though, using official drivers.

        • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, you just gotta set the right environment variables. Can’t remember them off the top of my head though, “NVAPI” is part of one of them I think. Don’t have an nvidia gpu anymore, though, switched to AMD about two months back.

          • heyoni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just came back to say it freaken worked. Cyberpunk on linux looks and runs just as well as it does on windows. I don’t think I need to dual boot anymore…

            export PROTON_HIDE_NVIDIA_GPU=0
            export PROTON_ENABLE_NVAPI=1
            export VKD3D_CONFIG="dxr,dxr11"
            export PROTON_ENABLE_NGX_UPDATER=1
            

            In case anyone else is wondering…

    • ______@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t a single piece of software that I use that makes me think I should upgrade my 5600. Not a single game fully utilizes it (on 1440p res)

      Older hardware is fine.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no such thing as magic. Some computation is absolutely getting skipped.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s usually called optimization ;⁠-⁠)

      Also don’t know how much stuff runs in the background on W11, maybe there is now more stuff needing memory and CPU time

    • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing; if the Linux version is missing useful output that would be bad, but if the DX to Vulkan translation ironed out a performance regression, or the scheduler works better in this scenario, or filesystem access had issues with NTFS it could also cause performance differences in Linux favour.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess I agree, but because the title felt a lot like a youtube channel clickbait promo, I bit. In an opposite way.