I’m on iOS 17.1.1 using Safari. I also have Proton VPN enabled in the states but if I try to visit any page on the website I see this:

If I disable it, the page will load.

Edit: as per a comment, this may not be a VPN only issue.

Additional edit: Reddit has written an official post stating it was an issue after production code deployment and was reverted

    • tokyo@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you encountered it without a VPN, it would appear to not be based purely on VPN usage - which at the very least is good news for the privacy oriented.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they want to block any mildly odd user agents, it’s probably to prevent webscrapers so they can force AI companies to pay for their ridiculous API prices

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a bug. It’s them running A/B tests to completely block mobile users that aren’t on the app. They’ve been implementing different versions of this for over a year now. They always lie about what it was. Actually they pretty much habitually lie about all of their tests and changes.

      • dreadgoat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

        I got this bug on desktop, running chrome, with no VPN.

        This was, as most things like this are, just a pure dumb fuck-up by some guy putting things on prod without properly testing and staging. No need to put on any more tin foil hats than we already have, the incompetence is plenty reason enough to point and laugh.

        • nis@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Both can be true. The incompetence could have happened while trying to block mobile use.

          The amount of dark patterns pushing users onto the app has already established the malice.

        • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If an internet corporation has a history of enshittification, it gets increasingly hard to clock up these kind of things to incompetence. While stupidity can certainly explain some things, it’s usually safe to assume it’s a bit of both

  • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    It appears as if reddit is trying so hard to fuck everyone off the site. And yet so many people aren’t paying attention and just visit it every time.

    They should just make a new landing page: “We don’t want you here! Go somewhere else!”

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reddit has so many users now, that they can filter out everyone who is in the very least problematic or not fully profitable, and still sell ads to millions.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not how greed works, nor how reddit works.

        The only time they’ll do something that reduces profits is when they’re confident it will mean more profits in the near future (and they can’t figure out a way to have both).

        That’s why they were happy to platform mask off neo-nazis, the dangerously stupid and communities dedicated to getting as close to child pornography as possible without technically breaking any laws and why they waited until the last possible moment to pull the plug on them.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s when they were in the “growing” phase, they used every tactic in the book, or even slightly off the book, to increase their numbers.

          Now they’re in a “distilling” phase, where they can get rid of the unwanted 1% to end up with a 99% pure zombie base whose ad consumption won’t get interrupted by some undesirable critical thinking.

          After they enroll enough ad purchasers or “content creators”, they’ll go into a “squeezing” phase, possibly after the IPO, where they will tighten the monetization mechanics in search of a balance between maximizing ad revenue and alienating advertisers… until they overtightened it, and go bust… only for another zombie-targetting platform to take their place.

        • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean it literally does. It’s the same reason Twitter hasn’t completely imploded yet, despite Musk doing his best to turn it into a cesspit. People stay on it because it has lots of people and their niche subs, which makes it harder for people to leave and coalesce in new areas and recreate niche subs, which feeds into the cycle

    • Psiczar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they are doing it to block AI from hoovering up all of their data.

        • Psiczar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I Imagine they’ll use whatever connections are provided to them by their AI overlords.

          The VPn may be necessary if their IP address ranges are being blocked, or it could be to get around an API limit?

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ModSupport/comments/17vbyr8/whoa_there_pardner_error_message/

    Text:

    Hey all!

    It looks like most of you had difficulty reaching the site for about 5 minutes, but those issues should have subsided.

    During that time, you may have been shown an incorrect error message that read:

    Whoa there, pardner! reddit's awesome and all, but you may have a bit of a problem.
    
    Make sure your User-Agent is not empty, is something unique and descriptive and try again. if you're supplying an alternate User-Agent string, try changing back to default as that can sometimes result in a block.
    

    To share some additional context on what happened - we pushed a bad code change in our tooling that resulted in a significant amount of users getting blocked without doing anything wrong. So if you happened to see that error message within the last hour, don’t fret! We’ve reverted the code change that caused this error and things should be back to normal very soon if they aren’t already.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “whoa there, pardner! reddit’s awesome and all, but you may have a bit of a problem.”

    ----------------V---------------

    1000013915

  • eutsgueden@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also started seeing this today while browsing on my work computer, which I believe utilizes a VPN.

  • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Additional edit: Reddit has written an official post stating it was an issue after production code deployment and was reverted

    In their mind the issue was not the blocking of users, but that the users have started complaining. I bet they just reverted it so that they can bring it back slowly, after just checking whether it is effective at all

  • bermuda@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t have a VPN and I got this error too. It resolved itself after about an hour

  • noride@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your VPN doesn’t have the ability to strip user agent strings on HTTPS requests, this doesn’t seem VPN related imo.