Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Israel has a right to defend itself, and judging its security decisions from a distance is “very difficult”, as Israel’s government vows to cut off food and water to the blockaded Gaza Strip.
I would argue that it’s quite easy to judge, at any distance, the collective punishment of civilians through the withholding of the essentials of life.
We’ve a referendum this weekend largely on whether we’re ready to confront uncomfortable and complex consequences of a history of colonial violence. What’s more difficult is reconciling these sorts of statements from a government that says it is.
The Aboriginal tribes didn’t slaughter civilians, or rape and murder aid workers, to be fair.
And the Palestinian population at large has done that have they? Maybe we should judge the so called “settlers” for stealing peoples homes and having picnics while watching Palestinian protestors shot by IDF snipers? Or shall we just pretend that Israel has been the perfect “neigbour”?
Imagine going to bat for Hamas, of all people.
They didn’t, maybe you’d be able to read better if you took your head out of your arse?
They’re whatabouting the fact that Hamas do, in fact, represent the views of most Palestinians. Comparing them to the Aboriginal tribes is a grave insult to the latter.
oh I’m sorry I can’t support Palestine because they won’t lie down and die
Imagine only supporting oppressed peoples when they don’t fight their oppressors.
If your support is conditional you are not supporting.
A bunch of teenagers at a music festival are not “their oppressors”.
“hamas” is quickly becoming an anti-Palestinian slur
It’s almost like they’re the government or something.
We had a period of frontier wars that lasted 150 years. It was grossly asymmetric but the estimates for colonial casualties run into the thousands.
Were those casualties civilians though, or were they mostly soldiers? That’s the key difference.
Good thing war is so blank and white, makes it easier to affirm my side is the good side
There’s one side that have done some very questionable things over the years, and there’s another that went out of their way to massacre civilians. I’m by no means a fan of Israel, but Hamas are outright evil.
Well, looking at the Geneva convention and Article 8 “War Crimes” of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, “Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions.”
And one committing a crime doesn’t allow the other to do the same. So either get pissed at both sides for war crimes or get pissed at none. But trying to excuse war crimes for one side in a war is a disgustingly hypocritical thing to do.
So either get pissed at both sides for war crimes or get pissed at none.
Yeah, not many people are taking that step.
I tend to think of it this way, personally: stealing is wrong, but it’s more acceptable to steal when you’re poor than when you’re rich. Both sides are committing attrocities, but one does so to opress while the other to liberate themselves from opression. I will acknowledge that my understanding of the conflict is very limited though, so this might be oversimplified or outright incorrect.
That is a polite way of saying the optics of the situation are awful and you want to admonish your ally but not openly criticize them.
Also, “what you’re doing is real shitty, but we can’t really talk about human rights abuses without making ourselves look like hypocrites”.
In practical terms how do you organise aid for a state you’re at war with? How do you ensure the safety of your aid workers in a way that doesn’t involve your military, but also doesn’t just provide new hostages? How do you stop your own aid workers from getting in the way of military operations?
I guarantee you Israel wouldn’t do this if they had a better option, this will only radicalise the normal people who start to go hungry and thirsty.
Seems like not cutting off food water and electricity would be easier than “organizing aid”
Why should they provide those things to a group they are at war with? After their government slaughtered a bunch of civilians?
The flip side of that coin is it’s pretty bad to make a independent population, who can’t vote in your elections, totally dependent on you. Preventing them from having independent sources of water electricity and food. Preventing them from self-determination and self-governance.
This all ties back to the core issues here. There’s a population that has no autonomy, no say in its future, no say and it’s foreign policy, de facto non-citizens in the state they can’t participate in. That’s not a stable situation, in any society.
Hamas, the elected government of Gaza, have vowed to exterminate Israel. Of course they’re not going to let them self govern.
You only need to look at the West Bank for an example of how things would play out with a more cooperative Palestinian government. Same shit, no autonomy, no say in its future, no say in its foreign policy, with the added bonus of a slow ethnic cleansing as Israel slowly annexes it’s land.
There are no good guys here.
To be clear, Israel is far from blameless in this, you’re quite right about that.
It wasn’t their government. It was an organisation started by an Israeli government at the time to combat the PLO
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Palestinian_legislative_election
Hamas is the elected government of Gaza.
deleted by creator
and the median age of someone living in the gaza strip is 19.
There is no reason to supply the means of sustenance to an active enemy you are at war with.
then they should end the occupation.
