“The room-temperature superconductor that wasn’t | Ars Technica”

arstechnica.com

“The room-temperature superconductor that wasn’t | Ars Technica”

arstechnica.com

tetrabrick [xey/xem, she/her]@hexbear.net to

science@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago

The room-temperature superconductor that wasn’t

arstechnica.com

We have good explanations for why a chemical called LK-99 behaved the way it did.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

science@hexbear.net

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@hexbear.net

Welcome to Hexbear’s science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

0 users / day
1 user / week
1 user / month
1 user / 6 months
0 local subscribers
1 subscriber
50 Posts
0 Comments
Modlog