inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months agoBoat attack commander says he had to kill 2 survivors because they were still trying to smuggle cocainereason.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down10
arrow-up131arrow-down1external-linkBoat attack commander says he had to kill 2 survivors because they were still trying to smuggle cocainereason.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·6 months agoSmuggling cocaine isn’t a valid defence of the first strike, why would you think it’s a valid reason for the second one? We don’t fucking issue death sentences for trafficking drugs.
minus-squareTriumph@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up6·6 months agoWe especially don’t issue death sentences for actions taken outside the country, or without trial. Wait, we’re in the upside-down. We especially do issue death sentences in those conditions.
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoAren’t they in international waters, anyway? They’re not even under the purview of US law. They can carry as many drugs as they want.
minus-squaretym@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoWe don’t. They do. It’s fairly well telegraphed in project 2025. Death penalty for drug dealers is definitely on the roadmap in the US, too. Christianity was a big enough problem without it being usurped by incels.
minus-squareIphtashuFitz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 months agoThey still haven’t proven the boat had drugs, or have they?
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoHaven’t proven ANY of these boats have had drugs on them. And if they did this is a good way to fight an endless war, by waiting patiently for the grunts to leave the trench and making no advance and gaining no intel.
minus-squareAssassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoHard to do when you’re executing people from 1000 miles away via drone.
Smuggling cocaine isn’t a valid defence of the first strike, why would you think it’s a valid reason for the second one?
We don’t fucking issue death sentences for trafficking drugs.
We especially don’t issue death sentences for actions taken outside the country, or without trial.
Wait, we’re in the upside-down. We especially do issue death sentences in those conditions.
Aren’t they in international waters, anyway? They’re not even under the purview of US law. They can carry as many drugs as they want.
We don’t. They do. It’s fairly well telegraphed in project 2025. Death penalty for drug dealers is definitely on the roadmap in the US, too.
Christianity was a big enough problem without it being usurped by incels.
They still haven’t proven the boat had drugs, or have they?
Haven’t proven ANY of these boats have had drugs on them. And if they did this is a good way to fight an endless war, by waiting patiently for the grunts to leave the trench and making no advance and gaining no intel.
Hard to do when you’re executing people from 1000 miles away via drone.