• Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    10 months ago

    List of assets owned by PepsiCo

    Agousha (Russia)

    Domik v Derevne (Russia)

    Evervess (Russia)

    Fruktoviy Sad (Russia)

    Frustyle (Russia)

    Imunele (Russia)

    KhrusTeam (Russia)

    Lubimy (Russia)

    Russkiy Dar (Russia)

    Vesely Molochnik

    Ya (Russia)

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      Apparently not. From my research (didn’t save any links) they just packed up and left without any fuss. Ironically that also resulted in massive profits for Pepsi because their nemesis disappeared over night.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a different scope for each company. Coke just loses soft drink sales. PepsiCo is like an entire portfolio of junk food.

  • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is there a compiled list of Pepsi shit that I can just stop buying? Let them lose revenue from everywhere else in the world and replace it with Russian rubles. I’m sure that will work out for them.

  • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some corporations are truly multinational. Can’t quite tell Russia company to not be a Russia company. That is just how it is. Sidenote: I have a B.S. in Int’l Business

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    How about all corporations stay out of international politics?

    • Tosti@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, if they play internationally they cannot. Telling individuals what they can and cannot talk about is another thing though.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They’re not telling individuals what they’re allowed to talk about. These are rules for official company marketing communications.

        We may not agree with their stance, but they are well within their rights here.

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re within their rights to be fucking wrong and suffer the consequences.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would prefer it if corporations just didn’t have the power to sway international politics. That’s not their wheelhouse and it’s fucked up that their decisions have global consequences.