A year after the world’s richest man acquired the social media platform, a game plan published by a fired Trump White House staffer provides a clue.

  • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yep, there we go. I’ve thought since the start his goal was to make twitter a more useful political tool for conservatives and less effective for everyone else. And if he couldn’t do that, just burn it down.

    • appel@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll be honest, that theory didn’t make sense to me, because who in their right mind would knowingly burn 44 billion dollars (and their reputation), but this article makes me reconsider.

      • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’d be the perfect person to do it as he has a cult of personality, likes being controversial, is so wealthy he never would need to work or start a business again, is a committed ideologue, and could afford to lose $20 billion. I don’t really think he had a solid plan, though. Musk said recently that basically he was up all night at Ellison’s house (who put up $10 billion of his own - out of his net worth of $150b) and made the twitter offer. And of course, he tried to back out of it for several months.