Columbo my love
ACAB should always come with a single exception: Columbo.
A man of the people, who only puts rich assholes behind bars.
Columbo my love
ACAB should always come with a single exception: Columbo.
A man of the people, who only puts rich assholes behind bars.
The full translation of the clip of Gaël Duval provided by GrapheneOS:
There’s the attack surface, on that front we’re not security specialists here, so I couldn’t answer you precisely, but from the discussions I’ve had, it seems that everything we do reduces attack surface.
However, we don’t have a “hardened security” approach, we aren’t developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice. So there aren’t difficult things to check if the memory is corrupted, really hardened security stuff that could clearly be useful for executives, in the secret service, or whatever.
That’s not our goal, our goal is to start from an observation: today our personal data is constantly being plundered and that wouldn’t be legal in real life with the mail or the telephone, we want to change that. So we are making you a product that changes that by default for anyone.
As a french speaker, I can attest that the translation is fairly accurate.
While I don’t agree with the characterisation Gaël Duval makes here, I believe the statement from GrapheneOS here:
Duval and his organizations have consistently taken a stance against protecting users from exploits. In this video, he once again claims protecting against exploits is for only useful pedophiles and spies.
Is a bit disingenuous. It sounds like they do make some efforts to secure their device, but it’s not their main focus. Theirs is to improve privacy first and foremost.
I would take anything GrapheneOS devs says with a grain of salt, as we all know that they have quite an adversarial relationship with… well… everyone. But especially other OS makers.


I was trying to figure out why people still use Axios, when the built-in fetch works just fine. Is it because people are still sending XML requests?
Look, from the little I know about the Iran government I do not like them much.
But this is really funny.


I agree it would be good to have third party integrity checks to not require Google Services etc. as part of the chain.
In GrapheneOS, many Google Play integrity check pass, but payments still do not work. You are notified when an app uses the integrity API, but probably only because they have spent a bunch of work sandboxing Play Services. This is what you see when you look at those details:

I guess the obvious problem is that so many apps rely on Google Services, such as for payments, opening the store, checking for integrity etc. On stock android, you can’t pick and choose these services separately or use third party ones, unlike using a third party keyboard, for example. Everything is one big proprietary, data guzzling lump.


Whoever promised that?
Updated the description to clarify.
The economic incentive from Signals point of view is that it allows them to steal users. Its a lot easier to switch if you don’t have to drag 100% of people you know off a platform to remove their app.
Look up adversarial interoperability if you’re interested. It’s how Facebook got big in the first place.
As for Meta, the only thing they would gain is less scrutiny from regulators as Gatekeepers.


Yeah it’s nice to have PhotoSphere back!


Yep, though losing your wallet and phone at the same time would be rough.


Made the jump last week.
The only thing I miss is Android Pay, but it’s not a big deal. Cards are fine, you’ll just need to remember your wallet.
I did find I had a problem with my work 2FA app, but that’s their problem to solve, not mine. Maybe they’ll give me a 2FA USB key.
A few pieces of advice:
I don’t trust anything this government does. They always find a way to pick the worst choice for everyone but themselves and their rich backers.
Even if they never abuse these powers (unlikely, given their track record), what’s to stop the next government from abusing them?


The one I hear is good is NVDA by NVAccess, but it doesn’t have AI.
Website: https://www.nvaccess.org/about-nvda/
Source code: https://github.com/nvaccess/nvda
I would be fairly surprised if you found an open source screen reader that had AI built-in.
It would likely have to run locally if it was open source.
Typically companies don’t make their stuff open source, and non-profits are unlikely to host an AI for you because of the cost. It’s unlikely to run locally as the cost for that model to run and download size may make it unusable or impractical for some hardware. Typically screen readers need to be accessible to everyone, and therefore need to run on very old and / or cheap hardware.


The source for this article is another article, which tbh is a better article:
https://cybernews.com/security/global-data-leak-exposes-billion-records/
That article does not itself have a source link, but it does show some redacted sample data and a breakdown of what countries are affected.



I said something similar here about an election fraud detection system with 99.999% accuracy.


Is this actually targeted at the UK?
It’s a super American ad. Everyone sounds American, we don’t really have drive thru’s like this etc.
In terms of message it’s spot on for both the UK and US though. Especially prescient given the Flock stuff going on in the US right now.
EDIT: From the article, it sounds like this has been used in a few places, but the UK is the only one that has banned it. The reasoning behind the ban is laughable.
It looks like there’s a longer version available on the site, but it’s broken for me.
Nextcloud isn’t really a direct equivalent to Google Photos. For that you want Immich.
Of course. It’s not like I want this. I was out there messaging my MP when the UK law had just been pushed through and filling out the petitions. It didn’t help though.
You can send a message to Discord by leaving, but they won’t revert it for places where it’s legally required.
I will say that this has been in the works for a little bit now and it’s more related to the UK’s new laws. We’ve had this age verification stuff on Discord for some months now.
As for why it’s being rolled out globally, not sure. The UK is not the only country / state starting to ask for ages verification on “social media” so maybe they thought it would be easier to use the same approach everywhere? Seems like a bad idea though as everywhere it’s implemented it’s unpopular.
My experience with it so far has been that… well… It hasn’t affected me at all. Mostly because I only use friends servers and activism servers. Those aren’t age restricted, so you never hit this check.
As far as age verification law compliance / implementation goes, this is not the worst one. That data leak early on was a clown show though.
+1
I discovered it when I found it was shipped with CalyxOS and honestly it’s way better than anything else I’ve found.
When a country does war crimes, the entirety of its populace is not to blame, the systems, power structures and people in charge are.
Most people in a country are not for wars or other attacking other countries. This is true for America and Russia alike, to the best of my knowledge (which granted, is anecdotal).
More people should be engaged in activism and should push back against the inhumane actions of their state, and people should be less gullible to the promises of their leaders.
Both America and Russia are overdue for major reform. Their systems are broken and many of their people brainwashed. Wishing harm on them does not help and imo is not a constructive approach. If anything, hate just begets more hate, making things worse.
If you are going to have hate, it should be more focused on the people in power.
Thank you, I will take those bottles to him… Each with petrol and a rag.