Turns out you can be a big Nazi and still have some valuable insight on how the modern way of thinking is shaped by technology. Since philosophy is not about idolizing one guy and dogmatizing everything he says, it should be possible to take peoples ideas into consideration regardless of (however keeping in mind) how shitty their political opinions/actions were.
Why would this little bash script that does nothing extraordinary need constant updates? Some pieces of software might just be complete as they are.
Idk, I’m not really talking about whether the article is good or not, but about the people it is about and their misconception about what the challenges of climate change will be. Maybe the article itself is also a problem because its not at all critical about that stance, but whatever.
True, but in General there is a tendency to underestimate the catastrophy the world is heading towards, and to make other people underestimate it too, so they buy your luxury goods.
People should start worrying about what they are going to eat before they make plans on where they are going to get the champagne from
It says in the article, the number of flights this would affect might be very small. They originally wanted to ban flights with a train alternative under 4 hours, but that didn’t get through.
I agree that manjaro is shit, but “your distro is shit” is not helpful advice for someone who wants to get their graphical session back.
You can also check /var/log/pacman.log for the packages you installed, then pacman -Ql the packages to list what files they might have changed
Classic, never fix anything, just change to , you wouldnt have experienced any problems, ever
Have you checked the log files under /var/log/xorg.0…log?
Also see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Xorg#Troubleshooting
If you want to get your graphical session back quickly, maybe try setting up GNOME with wayland (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/GNOME#Wayland_sessions)
I used to like the idea of nixos because it felt “tidy” to configure everything centrally. However that tidyness is achieved by adding an extra layer which just replicates the configuration options of every program. If there is a bug in that layer or something is just not implemented, either you have to learn the whole inernals of nixos and nixpkgs, for which there is no real documentation, or you have to resort to doing things imperatively again, which is hard because of the opacity of the generated system and also defeats the whole purpose. So basically, you are completely dependent on nixos developers for things you could have easily done yourself on arch.
Well his argument is that the concept of an objective reality requires the subject to abstract away its own existential entanglement with said reality, whereas the phenomenon everyone percieves directly is always the world that affects ones own existence, not the world as it is on its own. That’s not crazy, it’s an idea you can have. It also doesn’t mean there is no reality or no truth or that scientific measurement is pointless, just that the “experience” of the world is the primary thing and everything else is a derivation. And for me it truly is a problem that today’s notion of science tends to only value quantitative measurements, because for the humanities, that is a pretty big assumption about your subject that really narrows down the approach. (I feel there is a tendency to emphasise on producing measurements rather than on their interpretation) Maybe there’s even a link between that and the fact that it is so impossible today to imagine an alternative to capitalism.