Modified post. Read the edit at the buttom.

Now, call me crazy, I don’t think so! I have been an addict and I know how it is to be an addict, but I don’t think sugar is as addictive as cocaine. And I really am frustrated with people who say such things.

This notion that it’s as addictive drives me crazy! I mean, imagine someone gullible who says, well, “I can control my addiction to ice cream, heck I can go without ice cream for months, if it’s as addictive as cocaine, why not give cocaine a chance? It’s not like it’s gonna destroy me or something?” Yeah, I have once been this gullible (when I was younger) and I hate this.

I do crave sugar and I do occasionally (once per week and sometimes twice a month) buy sugary treats/lays packet (5 Indian Rupees, smallest one) to quench that craving, but I refuse to believe that it is as addictive as cocaine or any other drugs. PS: My last lays packet was 45 ago and I am fine, and this is the most addictive substance I have consumed.

I am pretty some people here have been addicted to cocaine (truly no judgement, I hope you are sober now), so what say you?

PS: If you haven’t been addicted to anything drastic as drugs, you are still welcome to chip in.


edit: thank you all for adding greater context.

I realize now that when they talk about sugar, they are not just talking abt lays and ice creams, but sugar in general. I get the studies now. But media is doing a terrible job of reporting on studies.

Also, the media depiction of scientific studies is really the worst. I mean, they make claims which garbage and/or incomplete data or publish articles on studies which make more alarming claims. Also, maybe wait for a consensus before you publish anything, i.e., don’t publish anything which isn’t peer reviewed and replicated multiple times. Yes, your readers might miss out on the latest and greatest, but it isn’t really helpful if the latest and greatest studies in science aren’t peer reviewed and backed up well by data.

I feel like a headline “SUGAR IS AS ADDICTIVE AS COCAINE” can and will be life destroying if you don’t give enough information. I feel like there should be an ethical responsibility to not sensationalize studies, maybe instead of “SUGAR IS AS ADDICTIVE AS COCAINE” give a headline like “Sugar and Addiction, what science says.”

also, https://i.imgur.com/VrBgrjA.png ss of bing chat gpt answering the question.

some articles: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/aug/25/is-sugar-really-as-addictive-as-cocaine-scientists-row-over-effect-on-body-and-brain

https://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/experts-is-sugar-addictive-drug

https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/cravings/202209/is-sugar-addictive

https://brainmd.com/blog/what-do-sugar-and-cocaine-have-in-common/

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m glad you found a diet and lifestyle that works for you. Kudos. Genuinely

    I take issue with your position that people talking about sugar addiction, and the difficulty of removing sugar from the diet for the average people, and especially the loved ones in our lives that were trying to save from medical conditions such as diabetes, are in the wrong for trying to help others. Sugar addiction is a very real thing. Simply because we have people in our lives who are being killed by sugar, type 2 diabetes is a great example, who have difficulty modifying their diet to live longer healthier more fulfilling lives. So however you want to address that vocabulary, there needs to be a discussion there, because it is a serious global metabolic epidemic. If you would like to give us the right vocabulary so that we can speak about it with you please I will use your vocabulary. But we need to have that discussion, and to tell other people that can’t have that discussion because it makes you feel bad, is insufficient

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s wrong to deny obese people agency or to stop others from holding them responsible for their choices and the consequences.

      That’s exactly what does NOT help people.

      What does help people is openly saying they are the ones making the choice about their own bodies and, most importantly, respecting the fact that they’re making that choice instead of infantilizing obese people by labeling them drug addicts.

      The only way we lose the weight permanently is either a drastic lifestyle change usually spurred by tragedy or hormone altering drugs like Ozempic, which themselves become something obese people become dependent on.

      And that is true because we choose to live this way.

      If you would like to give us the right vocabulary so that we can speak about it with you please I will use your vocabulary.

      Here’s the right thing to say:

      “I respect your choices and your right to live as you please.”

      And that’s all. Stop talking about it and accept them as they are, and stop trying to manipulate other people by equating us with drug addicts.

      It’s not even anyone’s business whether someone is obese or not anyway so the whole discussion is moot.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I disagree with the assumption. I would say a heroin addict has the agency, they got addicted to heroin, and they have the agency to get off of heroin. We are sympathetic to their plight, and we can certainly try to help them, but the agency is their own. You cannot cure an addict who does not want to be cured.

        So addiction, and agency or not diametrically opposed. You can have both.

        Helping people understand the journey they need to take is a good thing. Giving them the tools on that journey is also a good thing. The foundational research to understand addiction, and the mechanisms that people have to overcome it are good things.

        A lot of people live this way, not by choice, at least not by deliberate choice. But out of happenstance, because it’s the food that’s available, because it’s the food that their social circle is eating, because it’s normalized.

        Lifestyle change is necessary for people who are suffering from insulin insensitivity, but I don’t think it needs to be from tragedy or from external medication. It can come from understanding the mechanisms, and the nutrition.

        One thing in your debating style I really like, is your philosophy of not assuming for other people, so we shouldn’t assume how other people are going to approach their journey. We should give them options

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree with the assumption.

          And I am an obese person who is telling you your beliefs are not true, and to no surprise to anyone, here you are not listening and instead choosing to override my authority on the subject and you trying to impose your will on me to protect your cherished personal worldview in the face of the truth.

          An enabler demonstrating for all of us this is only about you and your need to have someone to save to feel needed, to the extent you are denying fully grown adults the respect of their personal experiences and their own agency as human beings? Well, knock me over with a feather.

          And it’s not insulin insensitivity, it’s insulin resistance, and you know what stops that? Choosing to cut out sugar. Know how I know that? Because diabetes runs in my family and that’s exactly what I did earlier in the year.

          You know how it is people do that? By being open and honest about their own choices and exercising their own agency, which you don’t allow people to do because you wouldn’t feel needed without invalids to care for.

          And who cares if your behavior is making the problem worse? That’s not a bug for you, that’s a feature.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I disagree on your authority to speak for all obese people and that only obease people suffer from sugar addiction.

            There are many non obese people with type 2 diabetes. The skinny fat population.

            Your message is about perceptions and authority- emotions. This discussion is about biomedical physics. You don’t have to agree with me, it’s emperical. You can conduct the measurements yourself.

            Insulin insensitivity and insulin resistance are synonyms.

            I agree cutting out sugar solves insulin resistance, or at least lessons the impact of it, I disagree on your premise that sugar is only sugar and not carbohydrates which are trivially converted to sugar in the liver. The issue of this discussion, and the one we seem to be stuck on is addiction as a biological rather than mental thing. That’s why we do the studies with mice. So we don’t have to get into the feelings of what is biological or what shouldn’t be biological. The mice react this way. That should tell us something about our own biology