Right wing authoritarianism isn’t subtle.

edit:

added context:

Here is what Ben is replying to:

Pro-Palestinian protesters a part of a group called “𝐏𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧,” vandalized a historic painting of Arthur James Balfour at Trinity College Cambridge in England.

Arthur Balfour wrote the Balfour Declaration of 1917 when he was serving as the British Foreign Minister. The letter expressed Britain’s support for a Jewish Homeland in what is now Israel.

Direct link(should work for a bit): https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1766117900644151296/vid/avc1/720x1280/pQDXaeuPY2vYbJdX.mp4?tag=14

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      4·
      8 months ago

      Can’t find any evidence that this is even a real tweet. These “text on image” posts should always be vetted with an actual link.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          118·
          8 months ago

          Thanks!

          Gotta say destroying art, especially historic, is a pretty shitty thing to do. It’s literally irreplaceable.

          Edit: Oh, I should add that I still can’t see the posts on twitter itself. Not sure what their settings are like for non-users these days though, but it looks like it should be there. None of the posts I can see have that format either, with the “breaking news” heading and red light emoticon.

          • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
            88·
            8 months ago

            Looking at it from the protestors view:

            Protesting the genocide happening: 30,000+ dead

            Are Palestinians replaceable as well…

            Property over human life, every time.

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              114·
              8 months ago

              Okay, but what actual reason is there to weigh the two against each other. Destroying art has no actual benefit towards effecting change in Gaza.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                  37·
                  8 months ago

                  These protests have actually made me less sympathetic to Palestine, not more so. Destroying property, in particular irreplaceable artwork, is not something I can accept under any circumstances.

                  • astreus@lemmy.ml
                    71·
                    8 months ago

                    If destruction of a painting done in 1914 and hanging in a university of a man responsible for oppression in Ireland and the current Middle East crisis (a known racist and anti-semite that passed the Aliens Act of 1905) makes you less sympathetic to ~600,000 starving people and 30,000 dead people then were you actually sympathetic to begin with?

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
      73·
      8 months ago

      Here is what Ben is replying to:

      Pro-Palestinian protesters a part of a group called “𝐏𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧,” vandalized a historic painting of Arthur James Balfour at Trinity College Cambridge in England.

      Arthur Balfour wrote the Balfour Declaration of 1917 when he was serving as the British Foreign Minister. The letter expressed Britain’s support for a Jewish Homeland in what is now Israel.

      Direct link(should work for a bit): https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1766117900644151296/vid/avc1/720x1280/pQDXaeuPY2vYbJdX.mp4?tag=14

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        246·
        8 months ago

        Of all the ways to try to get support for your cause, this has got to be one of the least effective strategies ever

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          105·
          8 months ago

          Because it’s not about gaining support. It’s about hurting people that you hate by destroying things they care about, like art.

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
          106·
          8 months ago

          Property over human life, every time.

          You may be right, but that is why the above statement was made.

          Backlash over historic paintings vs. 30,000+ deaths and counting.

          I guess that is what the protestors want…

          • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
            86·
            8 months ago

            There are atrocities of different scales happening all the time. There are only so many irreplaceable historical artifacts. If you destroy a historical artifact for every atrocity, eventually there will be no historical artifacts left and atrocities will still be happening.

            • astreus@lemmy.ml
              92·
              8 months ago

              Tired of writing this: this painting is not some culturally important piece of art. It’s a little over 100 years old, hanging in a university, of a man that was responsible for massacres in Ireland (Mitchelstown Massacre) which got him the name “Bloody Balfour”. Regardless of where you stand on Palestine, Balfour was not a good human and this is akin to toppling a minor statue of a Confederate in America - one that is not even on display to the wider public.

              EDIT to add a quote from Balfour when asked about whether the treatment of Black people in South Africa was immoral:

              “We have to face the facts,” Lord Balfour said. “Men are not born equal, the white and black races are not born with equal capacities: they are born with different capacities which education cannot and will not change.”