• Avg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ll probably pin it on the actors and writers when we all know it’s because they lost subscribers to their no password sharing policy.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      lost subscribers to their no password sharing policy.

      What, we’re just gonna gloss over how absolutely dogshit their in-house “Netflix Originals” media has become?

      It’s also because their current shows suck, and because any shows that are actually good get shitcanned after season 2, because Netflix sees less consumer growth after two seasons.

      Their saving grace is stuff like Black Mirror but to be fair that didn’t start out as a Netflix original and Charlie Brooker has tight control over his property.

      When they started Netflix Originals, they knocked a bunch of them out of the park, now they just make weak trash with bad CGI, costumes, and makeup.

      Stuff like 13 Reasons Why or The Witcher are just straight up irredeemable trash.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also their non-fiction is pretty bad too. It’s almost as bad as Amazon Prime now.

        Graham Hancock’s series “Ancient Apocalypse” on there is essentially nonsense.

        https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix

        Why did it get approved? Because his son is senior manager of unscripted originals!

        Also, they have a documentary on the “Blue Zones” where people supposedly live to 100 regularly. This is pseudoscience that has been exposed as poor record keeping for years.

      • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also because their current shows suck, and because any shows that are actually good get shitcanned after season 2, because Netflix sees less consumer growth after two seasons.

        I’m always surprised at how often other people (not you) will defend this practice from Netflix. It’s classic case of following the data in a stupid way. If their data shows that interest drops off after two seasons, I don’t doubt it.

        But… that comes with a cost. They have built a reputation as a company that doesn’t properly finish shows that they start, that will leave viewers hanging. That makes it harder to get people invested in a new series, even one that’s well reviewed. Why get interested in something you know will end on a cliffhanger?

        That kind of secondary order impact from their decision isn’t going to show up in data. Doesn’t change that it happens all the same.

        • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just gotta say you fucking nailed it. The long-term knock-on effect of people not wanting to start a new Netflix show only to like it and for it to be cancelled is too real.

  • noneya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does anyone else feel like Blockbuster might be getting a comeback story?