So you’re going to go meet a beautiful person and initiate romance then?
100 times safer than ibuprofen or Benadryl.
Never try those ones, they’ll fuck you up
Probably trying to upsell you a premium service but I’ve never had anyone call me over that, only seen letters/ads.
Edit: just read the other comments here and realized it could also be because of your utilization. You might have been flagged as being high risk, so they are targeting you for the product.
Drugs. All of them.
Whatever you do, never take a pill. Especially vitamin C. Or Zyrtec.
What does sex have to do with romance?
Also, are you aromantic? Why won’t you ever experience this?
Concierge service is usually separate from traditional health insurance. Idk what it means in the context of an existing plan.
Do they specify “I am from x company” or do they say “I am calling about your health insurance”?
Yeah, I really care about this, I’m literally losing sleep /s
God forbid I back up some folks on social media and say I agree with them
lol so this is cherry-picked data. They link to a source that shows if Kamala had been more conservative in these areas, she would’ve had more support:
Immigration Fossil fuels Ukraine (withdrawing support)
It also said that 14% said her support of Israel made them more likely to vote for her. 9% said it made them less likely.
Maybe MOST importantly is that the issues the polled on, in order of importance to voters, shows Gaza ranks LAST in importance. Shame on Common Dreams, I expected better.
It’s so easy to lie with data, thanks for illustrating that
Edit: okay, this is hilarious. Even the source they linked is wrong: “New Poll Shows Gaza Was #1 Issue For Biden 2020 Voters Who Did Not Vote For Harris”
Then the actual data disproves this. Neither for Biden voters who switched or Biden voters who backed Harris, it was not the top. For those who switched, it was NEAR the top. For others, it was dead last.
Also, the poll is exclusive to swing states.
I have literally never seen k used in percentages before. Km is common, as is using it if you’re writing out LARGE numerical values (10k or above).
I’m not saying it’s difficult to understand. I’m saying it looks stupid.
Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?
To piggyback on this, left-leaning echo chambers tend to underestimate the impact of turning on Israel amongst older voters, who tend to be more religious.
It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it
Except Yass is like the face of oligarchy and the one reason Trump wants to stop the ban
Can’t blame him on that last one tbh
Please stop posting reliable sources that have a left-leaning bias!
You might have joined the wrong platform
Go to a porn site and type “scissor” in the search bar
Grandma? You aren’t the best at guessing ages
I bet we can fundraise to get you there so you can just poop on the floor in the middle of the hearing. You can be the hero
Anti-trans laws have only increased in recent years. Having a Republican president won’t impact state legislatures and their momentum on this
Yeah people also smoke catnip. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should