• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And Starfield is more than twice that. It’s ridiculous.
      There’s no reason for it.

      • TrustingZebra@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Starfield is pretty huge though isn’t it? I dunno, it feels like if any games should take that much storage space, it’s a massive space game.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do you have like solid number of reasonable gigabytes a game can be? How did you arrive to this number exactly?

        • GreenMario@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t uNdERstAnD, a game must be less than 1GB in size or it’s unOpTiMiZeD.

          But at the same time, man I’m sick of these last gen/old non raytracing cards are holding us back! Where are my rig melting next gen games?!?! Oh wait I have to download 100GB and still turn down settings to High!?!? unOpTiMiZeD!! furiously leaves bad steam review