• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I didnt understand that sentence. Is that what you meant?

    Among other things, Debian wanted to integrate a part of the systemd tools into openssh, which almost led to a worldwide catastrophe

    xz is not part of systemd or openssh afaik.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      You didn’t follow the XZ-utils story ? The malicious actor worked for years on that XZ backdoor that targeted the fact that some Linux distributions were modifying their openssh package to enable systemd notifications.

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok true, it was a systemd dependent issue. But it only makes sense to have those notifications. The problem is dependency on small hardly maintained products, which systemd will improve by centralizing it.

        • Macros@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And where do maintainers for the new parts of systemd come from? The larger systemd grows the more parts of it will be neglected. Also in regard to people checking commits, opening up doors for exploits like the one in xz.