Sure, and that matters because…? You seem to be treating hare as something it doesn’t want, nor care to be.
I like to describe Hare as a simple, conservative, modern update to C, with a FOSS ethos. It doesn’t try to break computer science ground, or promise to solve a million dollar problem.
And upstream Hare will not support non-libre operating systems. That’s a lot of conviction, but Hare isn’t trying to take over the world. It will coexist with the diversity of languages out there, and thrive in its own niche. In short, the Hare project develops for a libre future and for the deliberate programmer, not the corporate, the ephemeral and the reckless.
It is their project, but no company will use it if it’s broken on Windows.
Sure, and that matters because…? You seem to be treating hare as something it doesn’t want, nor care to be.
From Torres, one of the core contributors.
Your metrics for success aren’t the same as theirs.