Fallout: London is a must-play. The marriage of Fallout 4’s more modern gameplay and New Vegas’ exemplary role-playing mechanics is a match made in heaven, one that occasionally surpasses Bethesda’s 2015 game.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As someone who played The Frontier and even finished the NCR questline for it, I’ve been playing London a lot. I do want to say that those looking for full New Vegas level roleplaying are going to be disappointed. There are SPECIAL checks, and traits do make a return, but by and large this is closer to Fallout 3 than it is to New Vegas.

    That being said, it’s a great game. There are problems with some of the writing, the Strike Quest where the outcome no matter what seems to be a resolution of two individuals and not the much larger number of striking workers is a horrible depiction of labor rights movements. However, the level design is generally really cool and atmospheric, and a lot of the concepts are extremely fresh.

    More than anything, it makes me super excited to see the release of Fallout 4: New Vegas, Fallout: Cascadia, and Fallout: Miami. It’s a surprisingly great execution on a non-US Fallout, and feels fresh, but doesn’t reach the height of New Vegas.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I want a FO or TES game that’s just a modder playground.

        • Build the world, don’t populate it with anything.
        • Divide the world into a grid, let modders submit mods to a central database and register them with the grid squares they alter.
        • Let the game download an assortment of mods (maybe using user-defined tags to preference certain content) that fills out the world, using their grid square registration system to ensure no overlapping / conflicting content.)
        • Let players rate content they play.
        • Reward the modders who made popular content in some way.

        Obviously there’s a lot of glaring problems with this, but in my head, it’d be awesome.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        barely. have you seen how buggy bethesda games are?

        i dont get how they are still a thing

  • LowleeKun@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Fallout 4’s more modern gameplay? Oh shut up. They lost me right there. Not that i did not enjoy Fallout 4, do not get me wrong. But it sure is not modern in any way that counts. Quite the opposite. It already feeled aged at release.

      • LowleeKun@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I did not compare Fallout 4 to New Vegas but to the time it came out. Which is 5 years later btw. New Vegas had a compelling story telling and role playing while Fallout 4 could barely shine with some minor modernizations.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure, that’s why the post is saying it keeps the modernizations of 4 while treading towards the game design of New Vegas.