The family may have invited him, but taking campaign photos is disallowed. The inviting family DOESN’T make the rules and their invitation doesn’t change the rules.
The thing is though, OP’s article isn’t really about the rules, it’s about one family’s displeasure with his appearance. I’m pointing out that this one family seems to be alone in being upset that Trump was there, in contrast with others who were happy he is there.
There’s no voting on the rules. One family (and this is just the one family that spoke up about it) vs one or two families that wanted Trump there means zip. The article focusing on the complaining family is just making it about human interest. Rules is rules.
The family may have invited him, but taking campaign photos is disallowed. The inviting family DOESN’T make the rules and their invitation doesn’t change the rules.
The thing is though, OP’s article isn’t really about the rules, it’s about one family’s displeasure with his appearance. I’m pointing out that this one family seems to be alone in being upset that Trump was there, in contrast with others who were happy he is there.
Again, it is not Trump’s PRESENCE, it is taking pictures for his campaign that is an issue here.
Even if the families who wanted Trump there (vomit) are OK with him breaking every rule anywhere he goes, it does not make it right
I don’t disagree with you there.
There’s no voting on the rules. One family (and this is just the one family that spoke up about it) vs one or two families that wanted Trump there means zip. The article focusing on the complaining family is just making it about human interest. Rules is rules.