• 31337@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think anyone is advocating for a “slap on the wrist.” The U.S. criminal justice system is the most draconian in the West, and doesn’t do “slaps on the wrist,” unless you’re in a particular economic or social classes.

    IMO, ideally, he would be sentenced for as long as it takes to rehabilitate him. Could be 5 years, 10 years, 30 years, or never, IDK, I’m not a psychologist. But, the U.S. prison system really designed for rehabilitation either.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, we need to be asking what the purpose of trying the child in question as an adult here is:

        Rehabilitation - I think the juvenile system would probably be better suited for this purpose, so no.

        Deterrence - I don’t think the knowledge that they might be tried as an adult has much bearing on their decision to commit the crime. I’d be willing to wager that people who do this sort of thing don’t much care what the consequences are. They’ve given up on themselves and their own lives.

        Removal - This strikes me as the main motivator. If the system has no way to rehabilitate, and recidivism is likely, then what other option is there?

        Retribution - As much as the US loves its retribution, usually it’s less keen to enact it on children. I’m sure some people would be happy about this aspect though.

        Retaliation - I’ll let y’all judge off of the tone of the rest of the comments for this one.