• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m not watching your YouTube video. if you can’t articulate a compelling reason, just say so.

    I find it hard to believe that it is the biggest impact a single person can have. can you enumerate the other strategies it is weighed against?

    you also aren’t supporting your claims about affordability, health, nor ease with anything but anecdotal evidence.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m not watching your YouTube video. if you can’t articulate a compelling reason, just say so.

      What absolutely trash reasoning. “Please type up a compelling reason just for me, I don’t want to watch a well researched and produced discussion on the topic.” It’s bordering on sealioning.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I did watch that video. probably a dozen times. it gets posted often. I shouldn’t be expected to debunk an argument that isn’t made.

        I rewatched* it after I made my comment though, and it does not establish what they claimed. it doesn’t cite sources**, and it’s primary thesis is “it’s complicated”

        edit(s):

        * i actually listened to it. but just now, after i made this comment, i scrubbed it and i found:

        ** they do some pretty hard-to-see and also hard-to-research citation in the form of citing academic papers in the bottom right of the screen around the time they are making the claim. and let me tell you, poore-nemecek is the basis of the lca analysis (which i could have guessed), and that lca analysis is flat out bad science. it’s certainly not a compelling reason to be vegan.