The donated handmade wooden benches are not ADA compliant so the city is forcing the builder to remove them. So having literally nothing is the alternative. Also the city says the builder can put the benches in their parks, but wouldn’t that also need to be ADA compliant?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The compliance rule is a stability thing underneath the bench, so that people in wheelchairs and other mobility devices can maneuver around them. Not that the bench itself needs to be concrete.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think that’s correct, but I’m failing to see the need for a person sitting in a wheelchair to be able to approach a bench on a pad.

      Are they expecting people sitting in a wheelchair to be able to transition to sitting on the bench for some reason?

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There are tons of other mobility issues people have short of wheelchairs like mobility scooters, crutches, those scooter like things for leg injuries. Or they might just like to park next to the bench and hang out with someone they know, like a regilar person.

        But mostly because when the bench is mounted to the concrete it gives the bench a solid base so that if someone is off balance and leans really hard against the bench, it won’t topple over. Think elderly people, or people with balance issues.