In a recent mailing list update, Linus Torvalds expressed frustration over passive voice in commit messages, urging developers to adopt a more active and clear communication style.

Linus Torvalds expressed frustration over the use of passive voice in merge commit messages, preferring active and imperative language instead.

He provided an example of how commit messages should be rewritten for clarity and consistency across the project.

Torvalds noted that while it’s not a major issue, it does add extra work when he has to rewrite messages to match his preference.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldEnglish
    0·
    1 month ago

    Linus Torvalds: creator of Linux and Git, and hero to all English teachers everywhere!

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      0·
      1 month ago

      So, uh, I have a colleague who studied linguistics, and when I explained to her that we write commit messages like that, her reaction was basically: What the fuck, why?

      My explanation wasn’t as sharp, as I didn’t call it “imperative” but rather just “infinitive”, which got me the immediate backlash that it’s not a sentence then, so why do you put a dot behind it?

      She did accept my descriptivist excuses explanation that we write it that way, because it’s terser, but I know it didn’t sit well with her.
      Will need to see what her reaction is to commanding the repo. 😅