Linus Torvalds expressed frustration over the use of passive voice in merge commit messages, preferring active and imperative language instead.

He provided an example of how commit messages should be rewritten for clarity and consistency across the project.

Torvalds noted that while it’s not a major issue, it does add extra work when he has to rewrite messages to match his preference.

  • hector@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Linus is a scary man and seems really hard to work with

    The fact that Linux blossomed anyways goes to show his talent

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      People say things like this but he’s probably successfully worked with several hundred more people than your average worker ever will.

      • hector@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        He said he has trouble feeling empathy and he’s working on it. When this happens he was super mean towards the volunteer work of some contributors who quit the project.

        I’m not blaming Linus, I’m just saying I don’t feel like it’s a good atmosphere to work in Linux. It doesn’t feel friendly at all

        Thus the scary and stressing quality

        • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s not scary. The trick when dealing with that kind of review is to parse out the technical and not take the rest personally, which maybe takes a certain kind of personality.

          • hector@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not being a jerk and having empathy are two necessary things to create a healthy work environment and are especially required when volunteers take from their off-time to work on your project.

          • derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I do that by default. I have to actively think about empathy when I do CRs, because the other devs (who should not be doing these kinds of mistakes) just can’t fucking do their job right for once.

            But when I am getting a review, I don’t get mad unless I am personally attacked (happened with a colleague who had a very high ego and somehow made it to a higher position, finally being let go about half a year back).