• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The argument is always “solar/wind still use chemicals” and never “this is the net reliance on extractive industry by energy source”.

    That said, general energy conservation is still important. You can’t cut emissions if all your new power just gets funnelled into Grok style AI.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t know that processing silicon is a polluting activity. There is heat involved, and some Chinese producers are 100% solar powered for their processing. Though I’m sure bulldozers or shipps/trucks are involved in obtaining sand.

      I’m not a fan of any appeals to gatekeep energy use to “just essentials” instead permitting growth that people want, and cleaning up the energy use involved.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not a fan of any appeals to gatekeep energy use to “just essentials” instead permitting growth

        There’s a huge gulf between essential and wasteful.