• Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 minute ago

    I’m happy with regular password FDE, i think i’m more likely to encounter hardware failure (and then need to read the drive from another machine) than theft of the drive.

    It’s a good point though, I’m sure many people do need this feature. Ubuntu is “working on it” but so far i guess it’s mostly not working except for VMs

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have a media center that serves over the internet via VPN, I don’t want to leave it unencrypted but I also don’t want to have to go home and type in a pass every time California has a power outage, which is monthly during the dry fire season and >monthly during the “storm” season. I wouldn’t care as much for my personal laptop or anything, but for servers it seems like an absolute must have and…what is Linux for if not servers?

      • Peasley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        I think the traditional way to do that is via dm-crypt, which you can set up with an ssh server.

        You can also use a network-shared file rather than a password for LUKS but it’s not as straightforward to set up as a password.

        Typing in a password in-person at a data center would be a huge hassle, agreed