• unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    13 days ago

    I bet it was to the kids he unjustly imprisoned and their families.

    Would 4 more years of house arrest resolve that?

    Funny how that goal is only meet for rich connected scumbags.

    Yep, that’s a systemic problem. The solution to that is not to regress to a worse outcome for all cases but to advocate for a better outcome for all cases.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yep, that’s a systemic problem. The solution to that is not to regress to a worse outcome for all cases but to advocate for a better outcome for all cases.

      But stop as soon as the rich fuckwits get theirs, like always.

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        Obviously not. Why would I stop advocating for prison reform when the work isn’t done? What did I say that gave the impression I was fine ignoring something I explicitly said was a systemic problem that required advocacy for all cases?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Any effort to reform the system that starts with rich assholes will end with rich assholes.

          And let’s not pretend this is an effort to reform the system.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      I bet it was to the kids he unjustly imprisoned and their families.

      Would 4 more years of house arrest resolve that?

      Would this judge be likely to rule “yes”?