• JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    And I wish that they had contributed all that energy to improving Osmand (a project which AFAICT has exactly the same goals) instead of reinventing the wheel. Then we might already have one amazing app instead of one very good app (Osmand) and a mediocre one which is marginally more responsive.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      OsmAnd isn’t exactly eager to accept community help.

      Also it isn’t being maintained by the community. It is a project done by a company.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Admittedly I had not looked into this very deeply. Seems to be an Ubuntu-type business model.

        OsmAnd isn’t exactly eager to accept community help.

        Maybe it explains this. Projects tend to be less relaxed about breaking things when they have staff to pay. But it has its advantages as well. For example I have always got replies on the OsmAnd issue tracker. Pure community projects tend to be more chaotic and disorganized.

        In any case they don’t explain their income very well, I agree that’s not a good look.

    • FlappyBubble@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are very different tools even if the underlying data is the same. Osmand is powerful and highly customisable but with a much steeper learning curve. Organic maps is easy to use with emphasis on UX/UI. I think they appeal to very different need and users.