ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Clever Comebacks@feddit.uk · 14 days agoWoman?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10
arrow-up16arrow-down1imageWoman?slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Clever Comebacks@feddit.uk · 14 days agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareOrlandoDoom@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoSerious answer: Anyone who identifies as one. I literally can’t pin it down more than that as there are exceptions to every rule. Same goes for a man.
minus-squaremihor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·14 days agoNo. While people have the freedom to call themselves whatever they want, I also reserve my own freedom to call them whatever the f*** I want. It works both ways. At least it should.
minus-squareAllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoremember kids, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences
minus-squaremihor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·13 days agoI should be able to call a man in dress a man, without any legal consequences. Snowflakes simply shouldn’t be able to terrorize others.
minus-squarepiccolo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 days agoCalm down King Edward. The scottish cant hurt you anymore.
Serious answer: Anyone who identifies as one.
I literally can’t pin it down more than that as there are exceptions to every rule. Same goes for a man.
No. While people have the freedom to call themselves whatever they want, I also reserve my own freedom to call them whatever the f*** I want. It works both ways. At least it should.
remember kids, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences
I should be able to call a man in dress a man, without any legal consequences. Snowflakes simply shouldn’t be able to terrorize others.
Calm down King Edward. The scottish cant hurt you anymore.