• moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean we’re already sending rockets up there. I’m sure we can afford to dump him out on the way.

        • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it’s component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Hmm, I think we shouldn’t rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.