/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.comexternal-linkmessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1437arrow-down117file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1420arrow-down1external-linkThe Pebble Has Been Brought Backstore.repebble.com/home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squaren2burns@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoYour response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAs I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.
Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”
As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.