droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.world to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 3 days ago

Do you think reptile live feeding is animal abuse?

32

Do you think reptile live feeding is animal abuse?

droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.world to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 3 days ago

I’ve stumbled across videos on YouTube that show snake owners feeding them a live rate or rabbit or whatever. Some people in the comments say well that’s just nature, others say it’s animal abuse. What do you think?

On reddit I saw a snake owner saying what they normally do is kill the prey beforehand with a CO2 chamber and freeze it, and that there’s no reason to feed live. Like the snakes don’t need it. If that’s true I guess it’s needless suffering then. Weird that these videos are so available on YouTube then.

Chat

Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
1·
3 days ago
It depends on which animal involved is native to which environment or part of the world. Imagine being a squirrel in Upstate New York and being terrified because Murphy’s Law now demands that you be worried about these fierce creatures the hoomans call komodo dragons.

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

398 users / day
1.2K users / week
3.18K users / month
6.27K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
2.98K subscribers
381 Posts
7.61K Comments
Modlog