Ruling is backed by more than a dozen prominent Muslim scholars and calls on all Muslim countries to 'review their peace treaties' with Israel

Several prominent Muslim scholars have issued a rare religious decree or “fatwa”, calling on all Muslims and Muslim-majority countries to wage “jihad” against Israel after 17 months of devastating war against Palestinians residing in the besieged enclave.

Ali al-Qaradaghi, the secretary general of the International Union Of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), an organisation previously led by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, called on all Muslim countries on Friday “to intervene immediately militarily, economically and politically to stop this genocide and comprehensive destruction, in accordance with their mandate”.

“The failure of the Arab and Islamic governments to support Gaza while it is being destroyed is considered by Islamic law to be a major crime against our oppressed brothers in Gaza,” he said in the decree comprising some 15 points.

Qaradaghi is one of the region’s most respected religious authorities and his decrees carry significant weight among the world’s 1.7bn Sunni Muslims.

  • blitzkrieg@lemm.ee
    102·
    3 days ago

    Israel is a democratic country. The Israelis willingly elect war criminals to lead their country.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          16·
          2 days ago

          No, that’s idiotic collective punishment. This whole thread is full of fucking genocide supporters pretending they have the moral high ground.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              17·
              2 days ago

              Yet cheering for a fucking fatwa against all of Israel, what the fuck kind of reality are we in where now we’re applauding this shit.

                • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                  14·
                  2 days ago

                  I would have defended against agreeing to specifically target civilians, yes.

                  Anne Frank would have been slaughtered as just another nazi Germany with the bullshit ethics in this thread.

                  • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
                    6·
                    2 days ago

                    I would have defended against agreeing to specifically target civilians, yes.

                    This is only something that you have assumed that other people want. Dismantling a settler colonial state is not genocide, on the contrary, it prevents future genocides. And obviously, a settler state can only be dismantled through violent forceful actions, especially against those who seek to uphold it. Any pretenses otherwise are just as delusional as the belief that Nazi Germany could have been destroyed without killing the millions of soldiers of the Wehrmacht who fanatically defended the regime to the very end.

                    Or in other terms, there are no wars against the leaders, the very concept is nonsensical. Leaders don’t fight wars, soldiers do.

                  • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlEnglish
                    42·
                    2 days ago

                    Literally nobody said anything about “specifically targeting civilians”.

                    Also, Anne Frank wasn’t German, dip shit.

          • voodooattack@lemmy.world
            41·
            2 days ago

            I’m not a genocide supporter. I was pointing out an obvious contradiction in your statement.

            And if you think Israelis are against collective punishment then how would you describe what’s been happening to Palestinians all those decades?

            Are innocent Israelis more deserving of mercy than innocent Palestinians?

            Here is your lever and some complementary trolleys 🎚️🛤️ 🚃, please submit your answers before all Palestinians are ethnically cleansed

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              15·
              2 days ago

              Jesus christ you people just make up what you think I believe huh?

              My principled stance is genocide is bad regardless of who is perputrating or even saying it SHOULD BE perpetrated (basically what this Fatwa is saying no?)

              I am absolutely against the abhorrent things that Israel is doing, fuck off.

              • voodooattack@lemmy.world
                51·
                2 days ago

                All genocide is bad. A declaration of war is not.

                My principled stance is genocide is bad regardless of who is perputrating or even saying it SHOULD BE perpetrated (basically what this Fatwa is saying no?)

                No. There is nothing in it about killing unarmed civilians or eliminating all Jewish people. It’s a call for all Arab/Muslim nations to form a united front and declare war, which, like all wars (sans Israel’s concept of war?) has rules of engagement.

                Your assumption that the word “jihad” means genocide is the problem with this conversation. “Jihad” literally means “to struggle/strive”. It’s used in several contexts and there are types of Jihad. (See the Wikipedia article on it for more)

                • There is “jihad Al nafs” for example, which translates to “to struggle against one’s self”, and an obvious example of it is to quit smoking, or stop overeating, etc.
                • There is “jihad Al mal” which means “struggle with money” and an example would be donating to a rightful cause
                • There is “jihad Al tarbiyah” which means becoming an educator/a teacher of good morals and Islamic/scientific principles

                You think I’m advocating genocide. I am not. I, however, am supportive of a war against a genocidal rogue state.

                Source (in Arabic): https://www.uae71.com/posts/117288

                Direct translation for the lazy bums who won’t bother:

                The International Union of Muslim Scholars, through its Ijtihad and Fatwa Committee, issued a fatwa regarding the continued Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip and the violation of the truce. The fatwa called for jihad and urgent, widespread action by Muslim states and peoples, including military action.

                The fatwa, shared by Ali Qaradaghi, Secretary-General of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, via his X account, affirmed “the obligation of armed jihad against the Israeli occupation for every capable Muslim,” emphasizing that “this duty extends throughout the Islamic world.”

                The committee also called for “immediate military intervention” by Arab and Islamic countries to halt the aggression on Gaza and impose a comprehensive blockade on the occupying entity by land, sea, and air, including closing its waterways, straits, and airspace.

                The fatwa emphasized the necessity of supporting the Palestinian resistance militarily, financially, politically, and legally, deeming it a “religious duty.” It also called for the formation of an Islamic military alliance to defend the nation and deter any aggression, asserting that the establishment of such an alliance is an urgent necessity.

                In the same context, the fatwa prohibited any form of normalization with the Israeli occupation, prohibited the supply of oil and gas to it, and called for a review of the peace treaties signed with the occupier.

                The committee stressed the need for financial support for the people of Gaza and the importance of urgently opening the crossings to provide humanitarian aid.

                In concluding the fatwa, the committee called on Muslim communities in the United States to pressure the US administration to implement its election promises to halt the aggression and work to bring peace to the region.

                Last Wednesday, Israeli Defense Minister Yisrael Katz announced the expansion of his military operations in Rafah, south of the Gaza Strip.

                The death toll from the ongoing Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip has risen to 50,523 martyrs and 114,776 wounded since October 7, 202

                Edit 2: more sources for your perusal:

                • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                  2·
                  13 hours ago

                  I did definitely misunderstand what the intention of a Fatwa and the Jihad meant from the classic reason of being an American who has never been pushed to read beyond what I have seen in media and such.

                  So, in that my original interpretation is definitely wrong, however I do still stand by my original point that it would likely have gone a long way to take the moral high ground by specifically stating that civilians are not valid targets.

                  I know that what the government of Israel has done to Gaza is literally genocidal ethnic cleansing, please don’t misunderstand what I’m saying as Israeli apologeia, I simply believe violence should be avoided if possible, in this circumstance it doesn’t seem possible with bad actors refusing to negotiate in any sort of good faith and the clear intent on display. (By Israel and the US again to clarify)

                  Idk, Muslim extremism has prevailed in the media in my lifetime with many such examples specifically perpetrated on otherwise innocent people. Having said that, I am aware that white nationalist/Christian extremism is alive and well in America and is frequently the cause of our mass shooting events and the cause of a lot of death across the world so… 🤷‍♂️

                  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    6 hours ago

                    Hey, thanks for being frank about it. I completely understand how the words fatwa/jihad/tuqqiya get misinterpreted due to the propaganda demonising Muslims and the Middle East in general. Which Israel and their lobbyist/proponents in the west—I.e the Murdoch dynasty—have a hand in.

                    I hate wars. Because all wars have collateral damage; especially in this age of bullets, missiles, and high-yield explosives.

                    Wars are always a terrible solution, but that said, sometimes the only solutions left are the ugly ones. Israel made its choice, and no matter what anyone says, I can’t really sympathise with an entire nation of sociopathic genocidal assholes because they could have a few good apples mixed in. I don’t think the allies did that in WWII Germany and nor do I condone/condemn it. (Except the use of nuclear weapons in Japan to make a point but that’s the classical US hubris for ya)

                    So yeah, Israel are now the genocidal assholes and if they get treated like nazi germany then that’s on them.