Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 4 days ago

What do you like about Lemmy?

108

What do you like about Lemmy?

Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.al to

Casual Conversation @lemm.eeEnglish · 4 days ago

I like that its smaller, it feels like the Internet used to back in the day. You get to know posters better which is nice

Chat

theblips@lemm.ee
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
13·
4 days ago
No ads, apparently no bots, no reddit-style comments like “This.”, no corporation involved
- Franklin@lemmy.ca
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  4
  arrow-down
  3·
  3 days ago
  this
  - sparkosthenes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2·
    2 days ago
    Nooo
  - arakhis_@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3·
    edit-2
    3 days ago
    is
    
    EDIT: Man… Im downvoting myself. This sucks
    - ToeKneegee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2·
      3 days ago
      SPARTA!
    - thiseggowaffles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1·
      3 days ago
      deleted by creator

Casual Conversation @lemm.ee

casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !casualconversation@lemm.ee

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.

RULES (updated 01/22/25)

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

343 users / day
1.54K users / week
3.24K users / month
7.09K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
3.12K subscribers
450 Posts
9.78K Comments
Modlog