The platform once known as Twitter failed the lowest of hurdles this week. Will we do anything about it?

  • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    These are not contradictory at all.
    People have to vote, and its easier to convince someone to NOT vote for the hated enemy, which implicitly gets them to vote for you.

    • spiffmeister@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this is a useful definition of voting for

      which implicitly gets them to vote for you.

      Seems to only be true if you think of there being only 2 parties, which is why I don’t think the definition is good.

      • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You, being aware that there are more choices that Labor vs Liberal, are more educated than the vast majority of my family (and dare I say the community at large), who believe that voting for anyone else is “throwing their vote away”.