• ours@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why privacy would mean no fax? Fax is mostly more secure than email.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Fax is unencrypted. Encrypted versions apparently exist but that’s not what Japan and Germany use.

      And that aside my mom regularly gets sensitive patient data via fax at her workplace because the number is one digit off some doctor’s (bonus points for the inverse also happening, and her also working with sensitive data). Far less likely to happen with email. At most encrypted fax is equally secure.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is however point-to-point plus doesn’t go over a public network and the routers of “random” 3rd parties (as IP does not necessarily route your packets always via the same path, and NNTP - the e-mail protocol - is even worse).

        It probably is inherently more private simply because generally there is just 1 company controlling the entire network it travels through (i.e. the phone landline network), though I would hardly call it secure.

        Properly encrypted e-mail is more secure with regards to the contents but it leaks metadata (that there was a message of a certain size from a certain sender to a certain receiver at acertain time) to a lot more 3rd parties than a fax would.