The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 20 hours agoIt's important to be clearlemmy.worldimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1582arrow-down16
arrow-up1576arrow-down1imageIt's important to be clearlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 20 hours agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squareRedstoneValley@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 hours agoTrue, but there are nuances. Stealing a symbol and giving it new meaning by using it for a different purpose is obviously a worse kind of appropriation than adopting language and culture.
minus-squarerainrain@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·14 hours agoSo it’s not just regular appropriation, it’s the bad kind of appropriation. Because they’re bad. Have I got that right?
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 hours agoAppropriation implies a form of exclusivity and denying the original’s validity. As in: KKK took that symbol and forever changed everyone’s association with it to their own org. It’s not appropriation to use a thing, it’s appropriation to treat your use of the thing as the correct/real one.
minus-squareMaeve@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agoYes. Cause it’s different when I do it. I really have to sit with this.
True, but there are nuances. Stealing a symbol and giving it new meaning by using it for a different purpose is obviously a worse kind of appropriation than adopting language and culture.
So it’s not just regular appropriation, it’s the bad kind of appropriation. Because they’re bad.
Have I got that right?
Appropriation implies a form of exclusivity and denying the original’s validity. As in:
KKK took that symbol and forever changed everyone’s association with it to their own org.
It’s not appropriation to use a thing, it’s appropriation to treat your use of the thing as the correct/real one.
Yes. Cause it’s different when I do it. I really have to sit with this.