• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m still trying to figure out how everything in the last 15ish years isn’t. Why do we have to be in the dumbest timeline.

    • blargle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is actually one of the most interesting and entertaining timelines.

      There was only supposed to be enough source data to make it to 2012- and that was originally a very generous buffer, since a fraction of a percent of Earths last more than 10 years after both networked computers and nuclear weapons have been invented in-simulation.

      So, the operators decided not to pull the plug and just let this one run its course.

      As it extrapolates history farther and farther outside of the initial parameters, the simulator is cannibalizing itself with feedback and undergoing model collapse.