• kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Most of these are scripting languages. Some are even markup languages. It’s like the meme creator didn’t even know what a programming language was.
    I hope someone got fired for that blunder

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some people think that only compiled languages are true programming languages. (Needless to say, they’re wrong.)

        • Malgas@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Needless to say, they’re wrong.

          Not least because there’s no such thing as a “compiled” or “interpreted” language.

          Which is to say that it’s a property of the tooling rather than the language itself. There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a C interpreter or a Python compiler.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            There’s nothing stopping anyone from writing a C interpreter

            Except god, hopefully

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Not least because there’s no such thing as a “compiled” or “interpreted” language.

            I’d say there is (but the line is a bit blurry). IMHO the main distinction is the presence (and prevalence) of eval semantics in the language; if it is present, then any “compiler” would have to embed itself into the generated code, thus de-facto turning it into a bundled interpreter.

            That said, the argument that interpreted languages are somehow not programming languages is stupid.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, once you know all the details, the distinction disappears. The term doesn’t clarify understanding.

          If I had to make a distinction, it’d be that scripting languages are meant to be a simple way to serve a specific niche. Things like SQL or Excel formulas. It doesn’t apply to Python.

      • mriswith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Do you know what community you’re in? Do you want to start a war?


        There is no clear definition because there is a lot of overlap, especially when you get into the details, but:

        • Scripting languages are often considered to be very high level and can commonly run without compilation. Making them great to automate tasks or create a simplified interaction/abstraction layer to a more complex program.

        • Programming languages usually have much lower level access, and by extension they tend to be more complicated. In exchange for that, you get much more control. Although the access varies from Assembly to languages a C programmer would consider “scripting”.

        Although for every example, there is basically a counter example. Because programmers being who they are, see it as a challenge to do something with a language that others consider impossible or wrong.

        For example, there are things like NodeOS, a “Lightweight operating system using Node.js as userspace.”

        • Pardal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          For example, there are things like NodeOS, a “Lightweight operating system using Node.js as userspace.”

          No way this exists.

          Wtf, it exists. Why would anyone do that to the world?