The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

              • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes. That is revenue, not profit. And it’s still true and the point still stands. You’ve done nothing to argue against that point. You’ve just made dishonest comparisons libraries and lending things to friends which isn’t the problem.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You understand that without profit you won’t have revenue…. Yeah?

                  This is the stupidest fallicous argument ive seen in a long time. Arguing revenue and profit aren’t related. Wow.

                  • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    You have that backwards. Without revenue, you can’t have profit. Revenue is the money you take in for your work. Profit is the revenue you collect for your work minus the expense of what it cost to create it.

                    Clearly, I’m dealing with either a child or a moron. Either way, I’m not continuing this discussion with someone that doesn’t even understand the difference between profit and revenue. It’s not possible to have a conversation on the nuances of piracy and theft if you don’t even understand the basics.