Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.

Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201

  • trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly hard question because essentially you want a game that would be worse now. Something that playing now would tranish it then make it better even with updated graphics/movement. Or something you know the company would take a direction which would make it negative.

    Something like redoing the original Super Mario 1, 2 and 3. Where the updated graphics and changes to game play takes away from the original pixel feel. As I feel Nintendo would probably use modern day Mario design.

    or mass effects removal of zoooming in on mirandas butt

      • tonarinokanasan@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They were remastered (which I think hurts the original argument), but I as I understand, the question of which is better is pretty divisive

        • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am unaware of any difference other than the obvious visual one. I never owned a SNES back in the day, so I kinda missed All Stars, and even when emulating became cool, I never saw a reason to emulate a game that then made me choose which game I wanted to play, rather than just choose the ROM for the game I wanted.

    • Que@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, SMW was actually the first thing that popped into my head when writing the post subject, SMB1-3 definitely qualify too. I’d put them all on equal footing in this regard.