For the second time this month the Biden administration is bypassing Congress to approve an emergency weapons sale to Israel as Israel continues to prosecute its war against Hamas in Gaza under increasing international criticism.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      My guess would be that there are many decades of existing treaties and legislation that allows the executive to do this for Israel. Ukraine’s troubles are just under 2 years old

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You’re absolutely right, and while the person you’re responding to is wrong about the Ukraine timeline, they’re pretty accurate regarding how far back the US relationship with Israel goes.

          A big part of it is probably the US being the first country to recognize Israel as an independent state in 1948, and there’s just been a relatively close relationship between the two ever since.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Agreed. The thing is we’ve been supporting Ukraine for a while now- helping build up their military and supply against the Russian invasion.

            Sure it’s a blink in them eye compared to Israel, but then Israel is established extremely well defended. Remember how Trump held up aid meant for Ukraine?

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Oh I agree entirely, I wasn’t meaning to sound as such. US government post the year 2000 has always seemed like its stuck in “old ways” of thinking. While Donald Rumsfeld moaned about “lack of imagination” and “unknown unknowns” in respect to 9/11, the reality is the US government and political class do lack imagination, and are largely stuck in routines set down in the 70s/80s/90s that aren’t really compatible with the modern world.

              A re-assessment of our relationship with nations like Israel should have been done long ago, and if we’re going to continue to be the biggest weapons producer in the world (which is something else I have issue with but is a whole screed of its own), the absolute very least the US could do is actually try to put weapons and training in the hands of people who really need it, who are at the mercy of despotic regimes trying to take over. Which in this instance would be Ukraine.

              Israel doesn’t need those weapons, and it can easily be argued that Palestine does.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was trying to provide an honest, helpful answer about the probable reason why the executive branch can take unilateral decisions about arms to Israel but not to Ukraine.

          The current arrangements for arms supplies to Ukraine go back 2 years.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The current arrangements for arms supplies to Ukraine go back 2 years.

            the current agreement with Israel doesn’t even go back that far. Things change. We’ve been treating Ukraine as an important partner since at least the Obama administration. Bush Jr wanted them in NATO back in 2008. Nobody is contending that Israel has been an ally for longer. But Ukraine isn’t exactly some rando, either. they’re a key partner- and were, at least, an up-and-coming regional power house. a power house that Russia saw moving increasingly westward in it’s political affiliations. (and Ukraine has historically been one of the world’s largest grain suppliers. during the Soviet Era, they produced all the grain for the Soviet Union.)

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              The history lesson is great. But are you claiming that the treaties and procedures that allow the US executive to supply arms to Israel without congressional say-so and the procedures for supplying arms to Ukraine are the same?

              Because I’m saying that is unlikely- and largely accounts for the current disparity

      • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        For someone who characterizes others as “casual observer of politics”, you sure don’t seem to be aware of, nor understand, current events.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Your own link suggests a Maybe at best.

          The considerable natural resources in Ukraine’s energy sphere remain underexplored and underused today despite the fact that their use could spur economic growth…

          It then goes on to say it would cost about 20 Billion dollars to put in the infrastructure to even begin refining/piping the oil.

          Israel is already pumping and exporting oil. It’s also already in bed with the US. From a corporate greed perspective, the choice is easy.

          • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            His link says yes, this is an intentionally incorrect response. Either that or you are an idiot speaking with confidence. But your description of Israel as a major oil producing state makes it pretty certain you are lying intentionally.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because Republicans are stonewalling aid for Ukraine right now. At the same time, they fast-tracked an aid package to Israel. Know where their priorities lie.

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The post above told you everything. Israel is an ally, Ukraine is not. To say that the distinction is merely semantic and not legally significant in every conceivable way shows a total lack of maturity and understanding of how the United States government operates, and how diplomacy and affairs of state are conducted. It’s like something a little kid would say honestly.

              Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, and as fucked up as it may sound in light of very recent events, Israel represents the only long term chance for hundreds of millions of people in the middle east for human rights. It’s not unlike America: It is not the country or the people that are a danger to the world, it is greed and nationalism. What Israel’s current government is doing in response to an unprecedented terror attack ks really a domestic issue, affecting a comparative handful of people as to what would be affected by an Iran-Israel war, which is absolutely what would happen if America hangs its ally out to dry, not to mention all the goodwill and credibility we’d lose with our other global partners.

              • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You’re downvoted because you’re full of shit. Show me how one is legally an ally and the other isn’t. Since you invoked legal significance. Further, for your bullshit point to stand, you’d have to demonstrate how it is not within Congress’s control, or the President’s unilateral control, to render Ukraine a “legal ally”, or whatever the fuck else you fancy your bullshit criterion to be.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  You’re at the peak of Mt. Stupid.

                  https://www.dsca.mil/foreign-military-sales-faq

                  Do FMS Sales require Congressional Notification?

                  Section 36 of the U.S. Arms Export Control Act requires Congressional notification for FMS or DCS sales expected to meet or exceed the following thresholds:

                  For North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries, South Korea, Australia, Japan, Israel, and New Zealand: major defense equipment (MDE) of $25M or more; any defense articles or services of $100M or more; or design and construction services of $300M or more.

                  For all other countries: MDE of $14M or more; any defense articles and services of $50M or more; or design and construction services of $200M or more.

                  For North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries and organizations, South Korea, Australia, Japan, Israel, and New Zealand there is a 15-day statutory notification period.

                  For all other countries there is a 30-day statutory notification period.

                  Additional Resource: Arms Sales - Congressional Review Process

              • ExLisper@linux.community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                How is democratic genocidal government better than autocratic genocidal government? Wasn’t Hitler democratically elected?

                Chance for human rights my ass.

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Bro, it’s like they wanna lose so badly next year election. Listen to the people voting for you, for fuck sake.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Listen to the people voting for you, for fuck sake.

      Are you new here, or did you miss when the Democratic party shut down Bernie Sanders twice in a row because he was gaining momentum and they were like “fuck, we can’t have a person who actually cares as President, we might not have as much money!!!”

      Because this is par for the course.

      • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not the best comparative argument, since the voting public was quite clear in that regard and the conspiracies claimed were debunked pretty easily.

        I, for example, was someone who voted against him because of his long-standing anti-science stances and his promotion of pseudoscience (such as him personally using his Senate position to host an “alternative medicine” conference).

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          You mean when they destroyed the Iowa caucus and handed the victory to a nobody loser candidate who never won another state?

          Not like it fucking matters. He showed his true colors when the Party gave him his marching orders. Bend the knee to the nominee, support the President no matter what, and for what? Clout? Social Democrats are the moderate wing of fascism.

          • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            10 months ago

            What even is the conspiracy there? Buttigieg won. Narrowly, but he won. And both he and Sanders demanded recounts for several of the counties, which was done. Incompetent county level people, often because they have no experience and are even volunteers for much of the vote counting, is fairly common. The complicatedness of Iowa’s procedure, where non-viable candidate voters get to re-vote for the viable ones makes errors even more likely.

            And errors were made in favor of both Buttigieg and Sanders, which were later corrected.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

              Clinton and her campaign literally were so full of hubris that they thought beating Trump was a shoe-in and went out of their way to help him become the presumptive nominee because they were so sure of this.

              I will never forgive anyone involved in the Clinton campaign for this, and if you refuse to see how the scales have been tipped for corporate friendly Democrats at the expense of Democrats who actually give a shit about things like unions and working people, I don’t know what to say.

              I mean for fucks sake, Biden is why Student Loans aren’t dischargeable in bankruptcy but we’re supposed to give the guy a handy for trying and failing to barely wipe any student debt away. He definitely didn’t just go back in time and take his vote back, and he definitely didn’t push congress to write new legislation to make it dischargeable in bankruptcy again.

              It’s a big club and we ain’t in it.

              But sure, it was just a big fucking accident that Clinton lost to Trump and it’s just a big fucking accident that Biden keeps going around congress to send money to Israel.

              It’s a big club and we ain’t in it.

              https://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-lawsuit-presidential-primaries-bernie-sanders-supporters/

              Later in the hearing, attorneys representing the DNC claim that the Democratic National Committee would be well within their rights to “go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.” By pushing the argument throughout the proceedings of this class action lawsuit, the Democratic National Committee is telling voters in a court of law that they see no enforceable obligation in having to run a fair and impartial primary election.

              The DNC attorneys even go so far as to argue that the words “impartial” and “evenhanded”—used in the DNC Charter—can’t be interpreted by a court of law. Beck retorted, “I’m shocked to hear that we can’t define what it means to be evenhanded and impartial. If that were the case, we couldn’t have courts. I mean, that’s what courts do every day, is decide disputes in an evenhanded and impartial manner.”

              Why even make such an argument if you can’t just prove you didn’t do such a thing instead of being like “actually, it’s totally legal for us to do that, so you need to be okay with it?”

              This is literally just like Trump. He’s not denying he tried to do a coup in court, he’s quibbling about fucking wonky bullshit like whether or not the President is an “office” of the US. It’s a bunch of talking out of both sides of their mouth.

              If they could defend what they did, they wouldn’t have turned to this defense in court. The fact that they did always speaks to them not giving a shit.

              • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                10 months ago

                We were talking about 2020. What does any of the block of text you’ve wrote have to do with voting conspiracies?

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The original statement made by me referenced that this happened twice and this was the first of those two times that I referenced. Just because you decided to only talk about 2020 doesn’t mean that’s the only one I was referring to. I wonder if you didn’t want to talk about the other because of the literal mountains of fucking evidence behind it?

                  If you want to do a run-around and act like previous behavior from a major political party shouldn’t be used to judge their current behavior, you’re just not arguing in good faith.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The AP itself doesn’t trust the results enough to declare a winner.

              Shadow Inc., which both Buttigieg and Biden payed for services in 2019, shat the bed and ruined the caucus. Those results and the recanvass were riddled with errors and inconsistencies, ranging from bad math to bad handwriting to bad head counting. It’s not trustworthy.

              Now, for my speculation: the Party sabotaged the Iowa caucus to stop an outsider from getting momentum in Iowa. Maybe the plan was always to just crash the caucus so it didn’t matter, maybe Iowa was always supposed to be sacrificed, but if Bernie had won Iowa and then proceeded to win all the states leading up to South Carolina I don’t think Biden would have won. There’s a clear motive.

              And what we do know is Obama played kingmaker by getting almost the entire field of candidates to drop out, including the supposed Iowa winner Buttigieg, to endorse Biden and keep the outsider from recovering after South Carolina.

              Part ordinary party-politics, part suspicious dealing with Shadow Inc., and the outsider was kept from winning. I know is there’s no hope for me in that party, because if another outsider comes they will be stopped because the party will circle the wagons.

              Especially now Iowa has been discarded. No more first in the nation, no more caucus, we’re just another trash redstate to be ignored.

              • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                10 months ago

                Now, for my speculation: the Party sabotaged the Iowa caucus to stop an outsider from getting momentum in Iowa.

                That is, at least, a conspiracy. Not one that stands up to scrutiny though. Shadow Inc did screw up. Unfortunately, if you look at state level things in many, many prior elections, that’s not uncommon. State level voting systems are tacked together, poorly funded crapshoots.

                And your claims about Obama doesn’t have anything to do with the voters. If the people who supported those candidates supported Bernie as a replacement, then that’s how they would have voted. But they didn’t. He in fact lost worse than in the previous election.

                The fact that the earliest states in the primary have long been those that don’t represent the general Democrat voting public has been a complaint for years, if not decades. So changing what states are at the beginning has been something pushed for for years as well.

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That is, at least, a conspiracy. Not one that stands up to scrutiny though. Shadow Inc did screw up. Unfortunately, if you look at state level things in many, many prior elections, that’s not uncommon. State level voting systems are tacked together, poorly funded crapshoots.

                  And your claims about Obama doesn’t have anything to do with the voters. If the people who supported those candidates supported Bernie as a replacement, then that’s how they would have voted. But they didn’t. He in fact lost worse than in the previous election.

                  So your argument is “all state level elections are fucked and Iowa isn’t special”. That’s actually a reasonable counter argument! Maybe all states look shady and corrupt and broken whenever anyone looks at them as closely as people looked at Iowa after the caucus imploded. If that’s the case, though, then that’s just a further argument for not trusting the elections!

                  And to clarify, I wasn’t claiming Obama playing kingmaker was a conspiracy (although it was in the literal sense of the word i.e. multiple politicians conspiring together to make Biden the nominee by endorsing him). That’s actually just normal party politics. It just shows that there’s actually no hope for an outsider to win a party nomination, which is to be expected.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve decided I’m just not voting next election. I’m sick of all the drama and lies, The US is fucked anyway, might as well not leave it on life support. Between constant wars, inability to handle the most basic of citizens needs and each party being a pissing contest I just decided there’s no point in doing so. Not like either candidate follows their user bases values anyway and it’s super unlikely anyone else will win. I’ll change my mind when I see evidence that says otherwise. I’ve given it 8 years and seen no real big change.

      • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t blame you. It’s exhausting to see American leadership spending the minimal amount of political capital to please the ruling class while working class Americans suffer and we see our tax dollars funding wars and genocide abroad. I’ve decided to vote for Claudia and Karina on the PSL ticket. It will be the first time ever voting for PSL but I am so done supporting conservative Democrats offering last minute concessions after flopping through the entirety of their term.

        https://votesocialist2024.com/our-program

        • DEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          For those reading this and think third party votes are “A wAsTE oFA vOtE”

          It’s a waste of your vote to vote for someone you don’t want in office, just because you dislike the other likely candidate more.

          A third party votes move to change main party platforms. If enough people vote for a third party, a major party is more likely to take up those stances to get those votes. Your vote isn’t always abouting winning.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Considering my state banned the most likely primary republican candidate, I don’t think the democratic Party is dying for my specific vote. And if they were, my recommendation is to find someone who can walk the walk. I don’t think the current one failed but, I think his priorities are in the wrong location. That is the entire point of the voting system, “you can’t not vote X or Y will win” is a toxic mindset, changes never happen if you just blindly vote regardless of situation.

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think people are finally asking themselves “If I’m voting for a lesser evil, and every vote of my lifetime has been a vote for ‘lesser evil’, is it the ruling class itself that is evil?”

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thank you for not supporting anyone committing genocide.

        Either a third party or no vote.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Your choice is between killing some or killing them all. Trump has said he will deport all Muslims as dictator on day 1. He expressed no sympathy for Gaza instead saying he wants it to play out.

        It’s the lesser of 2 evils. The world isn’t fair. But you have the power to stop the worse evil.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      LMFAO. Vote for Trump. That’ll surely help the Arabs…who he fucking banned from America on his first day in office last time. Super big brain move by the pro pally crowd if they pull that one off.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honestly, I’m sure the right wing loves this. They love a good war, and Trump won’t give that to them.

      On the flip side, watch Trump convince them all to denounce war. That would be hilarious.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m already not voting for Joey.

      Never voting for the lesser evil again.

      The entire world can burn in hell, for all I care. It’s what we deserve for constantly pussy-ing out.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So instead of just not voting and pussy-ing out encourage yourself and others to do more than just abstain. Voting is only one basic step for a society, we need to take real actions to make the change we want. Part of pussy-ing out is the idea that voting is all we can do, and now that voting seems useless we are just boned. There have always been people on the ground agitating for the real progress.

    • rivermonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lots of us believe in Israel’s right to defend itself. You’re on Lemmy, so it can seem that this isn’t a divided or divisive issue, but I assure you it is–especially among people who know their history. Another reason the bulk of the 18-24 group is making up a lot of the Hamas sympathizers.

      Not looking to debate it eith you, but I PROMISE, if you get out of the Lemmy bubble you’ll find it’s not a cut and dry situation like you framed it.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yet that’s exactly what Israel has done for decades and every gd President has backed them on it.

          Nothing ever changes.

          sigh

        • PatFusty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hamas has launched over 10,000 rockets at Israel in November alone. If Israel is getting bombed, they should be able to defend themselves.

      • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Israel’s right to defend itself

        This is one of the dumbest dogwhistles in existence. Everyone knows that’s not the actual point of contention.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Setting aside your defense of genocide, it’s a divided issue, but support for Palestine is higher among democrats, and especially young democrats. Biden is actively losing young voters moment by moment, and that will lose him the election if he doesn’t fix it.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re absolutely right that outside of “the lemmy bubble” you may find a shitload of unintelligent dumbasses. People incapable of critical thinking or the ability to form a thought of their own.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        A lot of us believe in Palestinian’s right to defend themselves as well. I work in a city, among many people that have no idea what Lemmy even is, there is a Palestinian flag on my work’s building and we feel grief at the atrocities committed by Israel. You’re right it isn’t cut and dry, but the support for Israel is at the lowest I have ever seen in my life.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Let these people think this is public opinion. Let them vote for Trump. They hate dissenting opinions, they’re about to find out what that looks like when you support Hamas because the GOP is looking at them like they wrote the playbook. This is a clear case of the Left having the leopards circling and looking for some faces. They’re starting on university campus and will keep eating lol.

        These people are just so gullible.

  • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like I once again have to ask why? Why does Israel need these weapons so badly that you have to bypass even Congressional approval? Republicans wouldn’t exactly oppose such an approval, they haven’t shown any lack of support for supporting Israel, just Ukraine. And Israel certainly doesn’t need the weapons for defense, as claimed by the State Department in the article.

    Israel is very handedly and with minimal resistance killing thousands of Palestinians. They don’t really need any additional arsenals.

    Unless this is in preparation for Netanyahu’s claimed invasion of Lebanon and beyond? Is Biden openly supporting the expansion of the conflict?

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is my question as well. Is Israel running out of weapons? Maybe they could stop blowing the fuck out of hospitals and shit.

      I’ve been awfully understanding of the complexities of geopolitics for Biden. Publicly supporting an ally isn’t a deal-breaker for me, but to do an end run around Congress to give more weapons and money to one of the best armed countries in the middle east so that they can commit more atrocities is a really bad look.

      Still voting for him because fuck Trump and fuck fascism, but this is really hurting my opinion of him.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think they are systematically mass tank shelling houses in Northern and now Middle Gaza.

        They are using an insane amount of ammo because their goal is complete destruction of all infrastructure so the Palestinians have nowhere to return to.

      • Silverseren@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m really hoping someone runs against him in the primary. I would say anyone, but then I remember anti-vaxxer extraordinaire RFK Jr is planning on running and also orb lady is still out there. So maybe not anyone, but there’s plenty of actually good candidates that could run against Biden.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I don’t think any of them have a realistic shot at beating a sitting President in a primary. I’m voting not Trump no matter what, and I’ll be happy to vote for someone other than Biden, but realistically this is the match up. Biden will get the nomination and the supreme court will eventually rule that Trump can’t be kept off the ballot. I’ve accepted it.

          At least I think it will be really fucking hard to campaign or raise funds from the hot seat in a criminal court pretty much every day leading up to the election.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Who is there though? In four more years we need another person to run against Trump… again…

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Obama was plucked out of obscurity and was an okay President. There are plenty of people who could stand up and get the job done, but about 5 minutes after this election is the time to start vetting them and making sure they have a better position on the middle east.

              Also if Trump doesn’t win this time he’s done.

          • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I honestly think if Trump was put in prison it would increase support and donations from average fans of his, it helps seal the idea that he is a persecuted outsider fighting against the deep state.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              The end goal of the money, besides grifting, is to get him elected. That’s just not going to happen if he’s convicted. I really don’t think it will happen because he’ll be so busy with 3 or 5 or whatever criminal trials that he just won’t have the time or ability to campaign effectively.

              So honestly I’m so for these saps throwing their money at him to set it on fire. Better trump than someone competent.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Better the devil you know. Unfortunately, I know both devils intimately well.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The absolute refusal to look at the mountain of video evidence of genocide is appalling.

    • abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      They do see it. They know. They’re enacting this genocide because they want to. The US government is and always has been genocidal.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Regarding the “it’s not aid, it’s a sale” point that some have brought up, we give israel billions of dollars every single year and biden has pledged 100+ billion more since the ramping up of the genocide. Whether they’re paying for it now or not, they’re doing it with our money.

  • andmonad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Question, if I vote for Biden and he wins and keeps supporting genocide, does that make me partly responsible for these kids dying? Don’t love the prospect of having dead inocent children’s blood on my hands.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your choice is is kill a little or kill a lot. Trump has promised to deport all Muslims and in response to Palestine deaths, said he wants to see how it plays out.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      A little bit, like saying German citizens were responsible for the holocaust for not standing up against the Nazis. They should have but when faced with violent repression you don’t necessarily blame them for not doing more. There is widespread knowledge of the military-industrial complex and the global stream of death for profit, but how many people are blocking ports to stop weapons shipments? We can vote for whoever but there is so much more that needs to be done.

      • andmonad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Which is kind of true right? I mean aren’t German citizens a bit to blame for the holocaust? And in my hypothetical case we’d be even worse since we’d be actively voting to keep the holocaust alive not just being passive observers.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think so, at least partially, average German citizens did know what was happening, plenty of people did resist, especially earlier on, with the brutality of the Nazis it’s hard to say if they could have done more.

          Today I don’t think there is a politician who would have much of a chance to win that wouldn’t support Israel at least as much as Biden, so I would say a person doesn’t share much blame just for voting. We can vote for whoever but there is more we can do, like boycotting companies that support Israel or organizing actions aimed at stopping arms shipments.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I guess as guilty as not voting for Biden and arms sales continuing regardless of who is in power. Your tax money still foots the bill and the cheque is in your collective names.

      • andmonad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        No wait if whatever I do child murders stay the same then it’s not my fault, I’m only responsible for stuff that I have control over, by definition. I’m worried about how much influence I personally have over how many innocent Palestinian kids are murdered.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      US elections are very much a “best worst choice” as the candidate is chosen by the party machine, and selected to best meet the party’s need and win by at least 1 vote.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you voted for Obama, your responsible for the drone bombing deaths of children.

      If you voted for Bush, you’re responsible for the children who died in Iraq.

      If you voted for Trump, you’re an idiot but I digress. If you are an American who votes, you’ve elected people who authorize military action that leads to civilian death.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah that’s all accurate. Also under increasing pressure from Biden. Not sure how anyone serious can blame Biden for Israel’s response, though. They have a national mandate similar to the US after 9/11. You think the president of France or something could have called off George W. from Iraq?

    No. At any rate, even if the current right wing leadership on Israel literally genocides every Palestinians, the US is not going to let Israel deplete its readiness for war with Iran . If anything, America will likely use this opportunity to increase Israel’s defense preparedness, just as we have been doing with Kiev and Taiwan. After all, right now, doing so is a proportionate response, from Iran’s vantage, to Iran’s sponsoring of Hamas.

    I agree Israel’s ongoing prosecution, to such extent, is out of proportion. Unfortunately, Hamas has apparently erected tunnel warfare capabilities that were beyond what US and Israeli intelligence knew of, according to NYT reporting, and also, and this is the big one, America doesn’t control Israel’s national defenses.

    The middleeast is undeniably the single most important region of the world as far as global security and Israel is undeniably the only (flawed) democracy in the region.

    I don’t know what card sheep in this thread think Biden has to play with Israel, here. There is literally no appetite in Washington from anyone to abandon Israel as it will 100% lead to an Iran-Israel war that might kill a hundred million people. Like let’s get real about the stakes here. There aren’t, 5,000,000 people in all of Palestine. That’s half of Iran’s capital city, which Israel will turn into a parking lot before it surrenders to the “supreme leader” of the backwards ass shithole of conservative nationalism that is Iran.