🤷

        • petrescatraian@libranet.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          @MBech @Nanook Not only that they’re more expensive, but they can be done wrong and are often done wrong, to the point that regular use wears them down or simply moves them away (if it’s not the people who move them away).

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Speed bumps are to solve issues with existing design. Curved roads are good design to begin with and you won’t need speed bumps.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Speed bumps slow me down far less than curves.

        My car (small truck) is most comfortable going over bumps at 30mph… Not the 10 they expect you to slow to. At 10 you get bounced around, at 30 you get 2 separate bumps that are far less uncomfortable.

        I call that really crappy design.

        • Nanook@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Curious what design the speed bumps are you refer to. Collecting the different designs and gonna find the optimal speed bump lol

      • Not a newt@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Speed bumps are disproportionally less effective on vehicles with larger wheels, which is the trend for SUVs and trucks these days. So while a compact or sedan may slow down for the bump, your average pavement princess will respect the bumps as much as they’ll respect speed limits around schools. Which is to say, not at all.