ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square126linkfedilinkarrow-up1489arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1481arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square126linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKintarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months agoI’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
minus-squareDigit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoProbably a bluff. I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery. [Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]
I’d like to go to one of their houses and tell them I want to search the place. After all, they shouldn’t mind if they have nothing to hide, right?
Probably a bluff.
I’m sure they’d not want you to find their dungeon, or evidence of their corruption and bribery.
[Edit: nor just all the usual parts of privacy and data integrity.]