Do you think it’s more effective to try to convince anti-genocide people to become a bit more okay with genocide rather than joining their side and remove both ICE murder and genocide together?
Harm reduction the day we get to the ballot, rest of the days to changing the system. I’d rather face shitty choices that move us 1 step back or keeps the status quo than to allow a madman the reigns. Things were shit before, they are worse now. It may take a decade to even get back to where we were let alone progress.
I assume that’s not what you want because you’d hold any amount of water for someone perpetuating a genocide. That’s not even taking into account that the efficacy of voting and getting your choice of genocidaire is highly dependent on what state you live in. The discussions sucks out all the oxygen from actionable things that might actually solve problems.
Do you think it’s more effective to try to convince anti-genocide people to become a bit more okay with genocide rather than joining their side and remove both ICE murder and genocide together?
Why do you assume that’s not what I want?
I just didn’t see that option on the ballot
Harm reduction the day we get to the ballot, rest of the days to changing the system. I’d rather face shitty choices that move us 1 step back or keeps the status quo than to allow a madman the reigns. Things were shit before, they are worse now. It may take a decade to even get back to where we were let alone progress.
This is assuming non-violent options of course
I assume that’s not what you want because you’d hold any amount of water for someone perpetuating a genocide. That’s not even taking into account that the efficacy of voting and getting your choice of genocidaire is highly dependent on what state you live in. The discussions sucks out all the oxygen from actionable things that might actually solve problems.