slothrop@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agoSpotify and Major Music Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillionhackread.comexternal-linkmessage-square90linkfedilinkarrow-up1359arrow-down14
arrow-up1355arrow-down1external-linkSpotify and Major Music Labels Sue Anna’s Archive for $13 Trillionhackread.comslothrop@lemmy.ca to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square90linkfedilink
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·2 months agoSpotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn’t even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 months agoProbably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive. So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$
minus-squareɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoPerhaps Anna can pay them off with theoretical potential money too? Like, a big collection of monkey NFTs.
minus-squarerbn@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months ago Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Because it was stolen already. By Anna’s archive. Isn’t that obvious!?
Spotify doesn’t even have that much net worth how the hell one can steal more than that anyway? Also this isn’t even stealing just a digital copy sent by spotify servers
Probably theorizing every potential peer is pulling the whole archive.
So net worth * 100.000 potential peers = $$$
Perhaps Anna can pay them off with theoretical potential money too? Like, a big collection of monkey NFTs.
Or exposure.
Because it was stolen already. By Anna’s archive. Isn’t that obvious!?