stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 9 months agoArtists are making creative companies apologize for using AIwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1192arrow-down1external-linkArtists are making creative companies apologize for using AIwww.theverge.comstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareShurimal@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down13·9 months agoNo-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.
minus-squarebramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-29 months ago But other artists aren’t allowed to profit off reproducing other’s works. But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles. Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.
No-one. Training a neural network, natural or artificial, is not “stealing”. Or no artist would be able to study the works of other artists to become a better artist themself.
deleted by creator
But we do allow them to take inspiration from other artists and emulate their styles.
Much of the issue around AI art seems to be more about the prompter (IE: asking explicitly for copyrighted stuff or real people) than the AI itself.