sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agoAnna's Archive Loses $322 Million Spotify Piracy Case Without a Fight * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down12cross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkAnna's Archive Loses $322 Million Spotify Piracy Case Without a Fight * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square40linkfedilinkcross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squarechgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up58·1 month agoNot that it matters since this isn’t going to get paid anyway but funny that the bulk of the judgement is to be paid to Spotify for building a shitty service rather than the rights holders of the music.
minus-squarePetter1@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoYea, and it is ultimately Spotify who had an exploit that allowed the circumvention of DRM in the first place. It is like Spotify is getting paid for having shitty tech that doesn’t do what it supposed to do correctly
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 month agoThe what whatters?
Not that it matters since this isn’t going to get paid anyway but funny that the bulk of the judgement is to be paid to Spotify for building a shitty service rather than the rights holders of the music.
Yea, and it is ultimately Spotify who had an exploit that allowed the circumvention of DRM in the first place.
It is like Spotify is getting paid for having shitty tech that doesn’t do what it supposed to do correctly
The what whatters?