- cross-posted to:
- linux@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- linux@sh.itjust.works
cross-posted from: https://feditown.com/post/3071906
Edit: To clarify, this is not my personal blog. It’s just intended to raise awareness and spread it around here as well. I just don’t believe in editorializing titles
not a single one of those compositors implement the entire API surface you need.
Aegis has requested that those of us who wish to not see Talon on Linux die out do the following:
- Do not, for any reason, discuss Wayland support with him;
- As a community, gather together, and successfully implement the entire API surface needed for Talon on GNOME, KDE, and wlroots,
At which point a new Wayland backend will be considered for Talon.
I agree that it’s not up to Talon to implement the missing APIs in the compositors. However, I think the dev is doing a disservice to the users of Talon by not adding wayland support (ie making the calls to the APIs Talon needs to function). If Talon used those wayland protocols, users could point to the software and say it’s “not working on compositor because the compositor is missing wayland protocols”.
IMO its a much easier sell to the compositor people when they know a useful piece of software is actively trying to target those APIs.
That being said, I sure hope the situation improves. The state of accessibility on wayland is pitiful.
I don’t know how you add a call to an API that doesn’t exist
as a solo dev, I honestly feel for him. It’s just too much work to actually even think about when you have other environments to support



